Skip to main content

Security report for struktonrail.be

Strukton Rail NV · Transportation · Belgium

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Strukton Rail NV is a well-established Belgian company specializing in the construction, maintenance, and renewal of railway infrastructure including tracks, signalling, catenary systems, crane rails, fiber optics, and surveying services. The company operates primarily in the transportation sector with a strong market presence in Belgium and international connections through its parent company, Strukton Group. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting B2B clients in the rail infrastructure domain. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance optimizations, including the use of Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and headers. Overall, the site is accessible, well-structured, and trustworthy, with moderate user tracking via Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching struktonrail.be

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Strukton Rail NV holds a strong position in the rail infrastructure market, leveraging its extensive machine park and technical expertise across multiple specialized domains such as signalling and fiber optics. The company targets infrastructure owners, operators, and governmental bodies requiring rail construction and maintenance services. Its business model is B2B focused, with revenue streams likely derived from large-scale infrastructure projects and maintenance contracts. The website's multilingual support and social media presence indicate a strategy to engage a broad regional audience. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel via contact forms, enhancing lead management. The company benefits from the backing of the Strukton Group, which may provide additional resources and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot is managed with consent, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities is recommended. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced by adopting best practices such as publishing a security.txt file, implementing security headers, and providing clear incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by including verified company emails and phone numbers for customer and security communications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Strukton Rail NV
Description
Strukton Rail NV is uw betrouwbare partner voor aanleg, onderhoud en vernieuwing van sporen, kraanbanen, seininrichting en bovenleiding.
Key services
Track & High Output Machines, Signalling, Catenary, Crane Rails & Industry, Fiber optic, Survey
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Slick Slider, WP Rocket, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management
  • Cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Dutch (nl-BE) with multilingual options.
  3. Strong focus on rail infrastructure services in Belgium and surrounding regions.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact form is primary contact method.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, YouTube, and Instagram supports brand trust.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-structured theme and plugins that support SEO, performance, and privacy compliance. Technologies detected include Yoast SEO for search optimization, WP Rocket for caching and performance, Cookiebot for GDPR cookie consent, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management. The site uses jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive UI components. Performance optimizations such as lazy loading images and preconnect hints are implemented, contributing to fast load times. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well addressed, providing a good user experience across devices. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the domain is stable and well-maintained. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with struktonrail.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review struktonrail.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.