Skip to main content

Security report for streetwork.li

Streetwork Liechtenstein · Non-profit · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Streetwork Liechtenstein operates as a non-profit social outreach organization focused on providing support and counseling services in public and semi-public spaces within Liechtenstein. The organization emphasizes confidentiality and flexible engagement schedules, targeting youth and community members. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact points and organizational governance details. Technically, the site is built on Concrete5 CMS, leveraging modern frontend libraries such as jQuery and Foundation, and employs Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and email obfuscation implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and formal policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned within its niche, with a moderate to good technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching streetwork.li

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a clear local market position as a specialized social outreach service in Liechtenstein, supported by local authorities and foundations. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on community support rather than commercial revenue. The presence of partner domains such as oja.li and sovort.li indicates a collaborative ecosystem within the social services sector. The website's content and structure suggest a small-sized entity with a focused target audience. The use of modern web technologies and analytics tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the presence of a newsletter and blog suggests ongoing engagement efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS and email obfuscation. However, the absence of key security headers and a formal security or incident response policy limits its maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Matomo and CleverReach is noted, but no vulnerable libraries were identified. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure policies are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Streetwork Liechtenstein
Description
Streetwork Liechtenstein is the outreach social work in public and semi-public spaces in Liechtenstein. They provide social support services with confidentiality, flexible schedules, and are not a 24-hour emergency service.
Key services
Outreach social work, Support and counseling, Flexible engagement in public spaces
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, Magnific Popup, Concrete5 CMS, Foundation Framework, Matomo Tag Manager
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Email obfuscation script used
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Tag Manager
Marketing tools
CleverReach (newsletter)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at Liechtenstein community.
  3. Uses Concrete5 CMS with modern frontend frameworks.
  4. Includes clear contact information and organizational details.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Uses Matomo for analytics, indicating privacy-conscious tracking.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected but consistent with business type.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Concrete5 CMS with frontend technologies including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Foundation framework, providing a responsive and modern user experience. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses Matomo Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-friendly tracking. The technical stack is appropriate for a small non-profit organization, though there is opportunity for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with streetwork.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review streetwork.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.