Skip to main content

Security report for streacom.com

Streacom · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Streacom is a UK-based company specializing in the design and manufacture of premium fanless PC cases and silent computing solutions. Established in 2010, the company has positioned itself as a niche leader in the technology sector, focusing on high-quality aluminium PC cases, compact mini PC cases, and fanless power supplies. Their target audience includes PC enthusiasts and professionals seeking silent and efficient computing hardware. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and contact channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Analytics for insights. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though there is room for improvement in DNS security and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good content quality and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching streacom.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Streacom operates in a specialized segment of the PC hardware market, focusing on fanless and silent PC cases. Their business model is direct sales of hardware products, targeting a discerning customer base valuing silent operation and premium design. The company benefits from a long-established domain and consistent branding. Their market position is strong within their niche, supported by clear communication and professional online presence. The company maintains active social media channels and provides multiple contact methods, enhancing customer engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. The lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests an opportunity to strengthen trust signals further.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and includes several important security headers, enhancing protection against common web attacks. Use of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate spam and automated abuse on forms. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. There is no published security policy or incident response information, and no security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with formal policies and DNS security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce risk from third-party scripts.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Streacom Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Streacom
Description
Streacom designs and manufactures premium fanless PC cases and silent computer solutions using advanced heat pipe cooling technology. They offer high-quality aluminium PC case designs, compact mini PC cases, and fanless PSU options for enhanced silent PC experiences.
Key services
Design and manufacture of fanless PC cases, Silent PC solutions, Fanless power supplies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plerdy
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  2. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  3. Website built on WordPress with Elementor page builder.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including contact form, email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to the technology sector.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It uses common web technologies such as PHP, jQuery, and Google Analytics for tracking. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential, especially in image loading and script management. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO practices are adequate with proper meta tags and structured data. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit but domain registrar is Tucows. Overall, the technical setup supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with streacom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review streacom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.