Skip to main content

Security report for stratis-communicationpublique.fr

Technology · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website stratis-communicationpublique.fr currently serves a security challenge page indicating the presence of anti-DDoS flood protection and firewall mechanisms. This prevents access to the actual website content, limiting the ability to analyze business details, policies, or contact information. The domain is newly registered in October 2024 with the GANDI registrar and is active without privacy protection. The website's title suggests a focus on security services, specifically anti-DDoS and firewall protection, but no further business description is available. The technical infrastructure includes custom JavaScript and Google Fonts, hosted likely by GANDI, but lacks visible CMS or frameworks. Security posture is moderate due to the presence of a WAF, but no security headers or policies are visible. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are found. Overall, the site is inaccessible beyond the challenge page, resulting in a low trust and quality score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stratis-communicationpublique.fr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the security challenge page, no direct business intelligence data such as market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships can be extracted. The domain age and registrar data suggest a new entrant in the technology security sector, possibly offering anti-DDoS and firewall services. No contact or social media links are present to indicate customer engagement or support channels. The lack of visible business information limits assessment of competitive advantages or growth indicators.

Security posture

The website employs a security challenge page likely as an anti-DDoS measure, indicating a proactive security posture against flood attacks. However, no HTTP security headers are detected, and no privacy or security policies are published. The absence of contact information for incident response or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. The domain uses HTTPS (implied by URL), but SSL configuration details are not available. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by publishing policies, adding security headers, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add visible contact information including business email and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  3. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website content beyond the security challenge page to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website displays a security challenge page indicating anti-DDoS flood protection and firewall. Content is blocked pending verification that the visitor is not a robot. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a security challenge page indicating anti-DDoS flood protection and firewall services, but no direct business description is provided.
Key services
Anti-DDoS Flood Protection, Firewall
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Custom JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
25/100
Good practices seen
  • Anti-DDoS protection indicated by challenge page

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible beyond a security challenge page.
  2. No business contact or policy information is available on the page.
  3. Domain is newly registered and active with GANDI registrar.
  4. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  5. No forms or user input fields detected on the page.
  6. No social media or external business links present.
  7. Website appears to be protected by an anti-DDoS mechanism.
  8. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  9. No security headers or advanced SEO metadata detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML with embedded JavaScript for the security challenge. Google Fonts are loaded externally. No CMS or popular frameworks are detected. The hosting provider is GANDI, as indicated by the domain registrar and name servers. The page is mobile responsive to a basic degree but lacks SEO meta tags beyond charset and viewport. Performance is moderate given the minimal content but user experience is poor due to the blocking challenge. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The technical implementation is basic and focused on security blocking rather than content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stratis-communicationpublique.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stratis-communicationpublique.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.