Skip to main content

Security report for storent.com

STORENT SIA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

STORENT SIA operates as a regional equipment rental and leasing company primarily serving the construction and industrial sectors in Latvia and the Baltic region. Their website presents a professional digital presence with a focus on a broad catalog of heavy machinery and tools for rent. The company targets construction firms and industrial businesses requiring temporary access to specialized equipment. Technically, the website is built on a modern Angular framework with Bootstrap styling, integrating common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and structure indicate a legitimate business. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices would enhance overall trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching storent.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

STORENT holds a solid position in the Baltic equipment rental market, offering a wide range of machinery categories including earthmoving, lifting, concrete processing, and power tools. Their business model centers on rental and leasing services, catering to construction and industrial clients. The website links to corporate and career sites, indicating a structured corporate ecosystem. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and good content quality. The presence of multiple external marketing and tracking services suggests active customer engagement and lead generation efforts. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security policies may pose compliance risks. The company could benefit from formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes to strengthen security culture and customer confidence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses modern frameworks, and avoids visible exposure of sensitive data, reflecting a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response information is published, limiting transparency in vulnerability management. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, formalizing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to harden web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to minimize privacy and security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
STORENT SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
STORENT SIA
Description
STORENT is a company offering rental and leasing services primarily for construction and industrial equipment. The website targets customers looking to rent heavy machinery, tools, and related equipment.
Key services
Rental of earthmoving machinery, Rental of telescopic and warehouse loaders, Rental of lifts and work platforms, Rental of aluminum towers and ladders, Rental of soil compaction equipment, Rental of concrete processing equipment, Rental of air compressors and pneumatic tools, Rental of generators and electrical equipment, Rental of power tools, Rental of heaters and dehumidifiers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 19, Bootstrap 5, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, SVG icons
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on main page
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in header
  4. Website uses modern Angular framework and Bootstrap
  5. Multiple external tracking and advertising scripts present
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  8. Website content is in Latvian language
  9. Social media links not explicitly found in provided HTML snippet
  10. No forms with input fields detected in provided HTML snippet
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Angular 19 and Bootstrap 5, indicating a modern and maintainable front-end technology stack. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel supports marketing analytics and retargeting. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization opportunities in script loading and image handling. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or SPA architecture. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a solid user experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with storent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review storent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.