Skip to main content

Security report for stop-partnergewalt.org

StoP – Stadtteile ohne Partnergewalt e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StoP – Stadtteile ohne Partnergewalt e.V. is a German non-profit organization dedicated to preventing partner violence through community-based initiatives at the neighborhood level. The website serves as an informational and engagement platform, highlighting local chapters across multiple German cities and Austria, and providing resources and educational content. The organization targets community members, victims, and supporters of violence prevention, positioning itself as a grassroots social project with a clear mission and active local presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, with common web technologies such as jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic accessibility and SEO features. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the organization's profile, with no privacy protection on WHOIS data, indicating transparency. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks advanced security headers and explicit public security policies. Cookie consent is implemented via a WordPress plugin, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with good content quality and clear navigation. However, the absence of a privacy policy and security headers slightly reduces compliance and security posture scores. The site is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stop-partnergewalt.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stop-partnergewalt.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for stop-partnergewalt.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StoP operates as a niche non-profit focused on social issues related to partner violence prevention. Its competitive advantage lies in its community-based approach and multiple local chapters, enabling localized support and engagement. The business model is donation and grant-funded, typical for non-profits, with no commercial revenue streams evident. The target customers are community members, victims, and social workers. Growth indicators include expansion into multiple German cities and Austria. The partnership ecosystem includes official help lines and women's shelter organizations, enhancing credibility and reach. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital presence improvements and compliance to strengthen trust and funding opportunities.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, but the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking or content injection. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML. The absence of public incident response or security policies limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance gaps include missing privacy policy and no visible GDPR-specific disclosures. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
StoP – Stadtteile ohne Partnergewalt e.V.
Description
StoP is a nationwide project in Germany aimed at preventing partner violence by community work at the neighborhood level.
Key services
Community work against partner violence, Local support centers in various German cities, Educational resources and training (StopPen lernen), Information dissemination and awareness campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German non-profit project focused on preventing partner violence.
  2. Content is in German language and well structured with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy policy page was found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a WordPress plugin.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies are publicly visible.
  6. Multiple local chapters and partner links indicate active community engagement.
  7. No advertising or tracking services detected, indicating privacy respect.
  8. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and common plugins.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CMS (WordPress) with Elementor for page building, enabling flexible content management. The tech stack includes jQuery and Swiper.js for UI interactions. Hosting appears stable with domain registration through a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in image loading and caching. Mobile optimization is good, supporting responsive design. Accessibility is basic, with no advanced ARIA or semantic enhancements detected. SEO is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags found. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential plugin vulnerabilities if not maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stop-partnergewalt.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stop-partnergewalt.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.