Skip to main content

Security report for stichtingpresent.nl

Stichting Present Nederland · Non-profit · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stichting Present Nederland is a Dutch non-profit organization dedicated to connecting volunteers with individuals and communities in need, fostering a caring society. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, with clear descriptions of its mission and services. It targets a general audience interested in social volunteering and community support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing common plugins such as Gravity Forms and Cookiebot for consent management. The infrastructure includes modern web technologies and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a good balance of usability, compliance, and trustworthiness, suitable for its non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stichtingpresent.nl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on social volunteering and community engagement within the Netherlands. It maintains a medium-sized presence with a clear business model centered on volunteer coordination. The website supports this with contact information, social media integration, and structured data for enhanced search visibility. While no explicit revenue streams or partnerships were identified in the content, the presence of multiple social media channels and a professional website suggests active community engagement. The lack of visible certifications or compliance badges indicates potential areas for growth in trust signals. The business appears well-positioned within its niche, leveraging digital tools to facilitate its mission.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable cookie consent platform (Cookiebot) to comply with privacy regulations. Security best practices such as avoiding exposed sensitive data and using secure forms are observed. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident in the provided data, representing an opportunity for enhancement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be beneficial for transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts and analytics is managed with consent, aligning with GDPR principles. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Develop and display an incident response policy or contact channel to demonstrate readiness for security events.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to enhance credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Stichting Present Nederland
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stichting Present Nederland
Description
Present slaat een brug tussen mensen die vrijwillig hulp willen geven en zij die hulp kunnen gebruiken. Zo bouwt Present aan samenleving die omziet.
Key services
Volunteer coordination, Community support projects, Social engagement facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Leaflet.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. Multiple social media profiles linked and verified via structured data
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Gravity Forms
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in provided content
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and physical address
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  9. No certifications or compliance badges visible
  10. Website content is in Dutch and targets Dutch audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Leaflet.js for maps, Gravity Forms for form management, and Cookiebot for cookie consent. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and plugins. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's goals but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stichtingpresent.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stichtingpresent.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.