Skip to main content

Security report for stichtingjarigejob.nl

Stichting Jarige Job · Non-profit · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stichting Jarige Job is a Dutch non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring that children in financially disadvantaged households can celebrate their birthdays. With over 15 years of operation and recognized by the CBF certification, the organization has established a strong market position within the social aid sector in the Netherlands. Their key services include providing birthday packages and raising awareness and donations to support their cause. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting donors and beneficiaries in the Netherlands. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for compliance and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, providing a good user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stichtingjarigejob.nl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focusing on social welfare for children. Its business model relies on donations and partnerships to deliver birthday packages to children in need. The website's structured data and social media presence indicate a well-managed digital footprint. The organization benefits from trust signals such as CBF certification and transparent privacy and cookie policies. The absence of phone numbers or physical addresses in the provided content suggests a focus on digital contact channels and social media engagement. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm the organization's long-standing presence and legitimacy in the market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced, DNSSEC enabled, and multiple security headers present. The use of Cookiebot ensures GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The presence of reCAPTCHA scripts indicates protection against automated abuse in forms. However, the site lacks a publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is good for a non-profit organization, with recommendations to publish security policies and consider a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stichting Jarige Job
Description
Ieder kind verdient een verjaardag. Daarom helpt Stichting Jarige Job kinderen waarbij er thuis geen geld is voor het vieren van een verjaardag.
Key services
Providing birthday packages to children in financial need, Raising awareness and donations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Typekit Fonts, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Tealium
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Tealium, New Relic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Dutch non-profit organization.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  6. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms.
  7. Social media presence across multiple platforms.
  8. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for form management, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent. Fonts are served via Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit, and animations are handled by AOS. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. DNSSEC is enabled, enhancing DNS security. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. There is no explicit hosting provider information detected. The technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital presence effectively but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stichtingjarigejob.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stichtingjarigejob.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.