Skip to main content

Security report for stichtingdelacroix.be

Stichting M. M. Delacroix · Non-profit · Belgium

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stichting M. M. Delacroix is a well-established Belgian non-profit organization founded in 2005, providing care and support for children and adults with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities and individuals with acquired brain injuries (NAH). The organization positions itself as a warm home and development place, emphasizing a caring community for residents and staff alike. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with clear navigation and rich content including news, events, and employment opportunities. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and integrates Iubenda for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Contact information is clearly presented, including phone, email, physical address, and active social media channels. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stichtingdelacroix.be

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stichtingdelacroix.be, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for stichtingdelacroix.be right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit healthcare sector, focusing on specialized care for intellectually disabled and brain-injured individuals. Their business model centers on providing residential and therapeutic services, supported by partnerships with regional organizations like Trede and Vaph. The presence of a dedicated employment site indicates active recruitment and community engagement. Market positioning is stable with a long operational history and a clear mission. Revenue streams likely include government funding, donations, and service contracts. The partnership ecosystem enhances credibility and resource access. Growth indicators include active news updates and event calendars. Strategic observations suggest a focus on community integration and quality care.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Iubenda, supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy documents are publicly available, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. The site does not expose any forms with sensitive input fields beyond standard navigation and contact links, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced HTTP header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced via dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic performance optimizations to maintain excellent user experience across devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stichting M. M. Delacroix
Description
Een warme thuis voor kinderen en volwassenen met een matig tot diep verstandelijke beperking en voor personen met een niet-aangeboren hersenletsel (NAH). Een plek om te ontwikkelen maar ook om te genieten.
Key services
zorg voor kinderen en volwassenen met verstandelijke beperking, ondersteuning voor personen met niet-aangeboren hersenletsel, activiteiten en therapieën, werkgelegenheid en vrijwilligersmogelijkheden
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.3, Iubenda cookie solution, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Iubenda cookie solution
Marketing tools
Iubenda cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on care and support for people with intellectual disabilities and brain injuries
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with Iubenda integration
  4. Clear contact information and social media presence
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but straightforward technology stack including jQuery 3.6.3 and Slick Carousel for UI components, with Iubenda managing cookie consent and privacy compliance. Hosting is provided by edpnet, a Belgian ISP, consistent with the organization's location. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected but potential for optimization exists. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. The site includes well-structured metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Technical risks are low, but the lack of security headers and limited visible security policies represent areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stichtingdelacroix.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stichtingdelacroix.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.