Bio Vakantieoord · Non-profit · Netherlands
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.
Bio Vakantieoord is a specialized non-profit holiday park in the Netherlands dedicated to providing adapted vacation experiences for families with handicapped children. The organization offers a fully accessible environment with adapted holiday homes, camping options, care services, and a variety of activities including a special swimming pool, adapted riding school, and cinema. The website reflects a strong market position as a unique provider in this niche, supported by recognized certifications such as ANBI and CBF. The target audience is clearly defined, and the business model focuses on charitable support and community engagement through donations and volunteering. Technically, the website is built on the Procurios CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries like Prototype.js and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including a consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements CSRF tokens in forms, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and published policies. The overall risk assessment is low, with a trustworthy domain registration and consistent business information. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention stichtingbio.nl, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for stichtingbio.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with stichtingbio.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stichtingbio.nl.