Skip to main content

Security report for stewartmouland.co.uk

Stewart Mouland Motorcaravans · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stewart Mouland Motorcaravans is a well-established family-run motorhome dealership operating since 1985 in Peacehaven, East Sussex. The company offers a wide range of new and used motorhomes, servicing, hire, and sales services, targeting customers in the Brighton and East Sussex region. Their website reflects a professional and customer-friendly approach with clear contact information, a modern showroom, and a workshop. Technically, the website employs modern analytics and marketing tools with a consent-based cookie mechanism, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though some security headers are missing. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or invalid, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy, but the website content and business information appear consistent and trustworthy. Overall, the site is functional, secure, and compliant, but domain registration details should be further verified.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stewartmouland.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation sector, specifically focusing on motorhomes. It has a strong local market presence with a large inventory and a comprehensive service offering including sales, servicing, hire, and accessories. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Ads and Facebook Ads, supported by analytics platforms like Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity. The business model is retail-focused with direct customer engagement through physical and online channels. The company maintains a Facebook presence and provides clear contact and location details, enhancing customer trust. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not currently impact operational credibility. The company registration number is provided, indicating formal business registration.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens in forms, indicating good baseline security practices. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate potential risks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Verify and correct domain WHOIS registration details to resolve legitimacy concerns.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
02510030
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stewart Mouland Motorcaravans
Description
Stewart Mouland Motorcaravans is a family-run motorhome dealership based in Peacehaven, East Sussex, trading since 1985. They offer new and used motorhomes, servicing, hire, and sales including part-exchange. They stock over 65 new and used vans from UK manufacturers and provide a welcoming showroom and workshop.
Key services
Used motorhome sales, New motorhome sales, Motorhome servicing and aftersales, Motorhome hire, Motorhome selling and valuation, Accessories and parts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, jQuery, Yii Framework (inferred from yiiActiveForm), Cookie Consent JS
Frameworks
Yii PHP Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in forms
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or invalid, which is unusual and reduces trust in domain registration legitimacy.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with consent management.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Website uses modern technologies and frameworks with good mobile optimization.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including the Yii PHP framework, jQuery, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses cookie consent management to comply with privacy laws. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly online presence with room for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stewartmouland.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stewartmouland.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.