Skip to main content

Security report for stenaline.ee

Stena Line · Transportation · Estonia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stena Line is a well-established ferry transportation company operating in Northern Europe, providing passenger and freight ferry services across multiple countries including Estonia, Sweden, Germany, and the UK. The website offers comprehensive information about routes, vessels, and booking options, targeting travelers and freight customers. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Cloudflare security services, and advanced marketing and analytics tools such as Adobe Analytics and Kameleoon. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and bot protection mechanisms in place, though explicit security and incident response policies are not prominently published. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with GDPR, reflecting a mature digital presence for a large transportation enterprise.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 10 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stenaline.ee

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stena Line holds a strong market position as a leading ferry operator in Northern Europe, supported by a large fleet and multiple regional subsidiaries. The business model focuses on passenger and freight transport with online booking capabilities. The company benefits from a broad partnership ecosystem, including dedicated booking platforms and travel partners. The website supports multiple languages and regional domains, indicating a globalized approach. Trust indicators such as privacy policies, cookie consent, and data protection officer contacts enhance credibility. The company is part of the larger Stena AB group, which adds to its financial and operational stability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and anti-bot measures like Google reCAPTCHA and Cloudflare Turnstile. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. The presence of a Data Protection Officer contact is a positive compliance indicator. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices for a transportation service provider.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact details and procedures for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by detailing data retention policies and security certifications.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Stena Line AB
VAT number
SE556012-6601
Registration number
556012-6601
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stena Line
Description
Reisige Stena Line’iga Ühendkuningriiki, Iirimaale, Hollandisse ja Põhja-Euroopasse. Vaadake meie liine, laevu, eripakkumisi ja paljut muud. Soodsaima hinna saate veebis broneerimisel.
Key services
Passenger ferry transport, Freight ferry transport, Online booking services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare Turnstile, Kameleoon A/B testing, Teads advertising, Sembo Inspire APIs
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA and Turnstile for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Teads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Adobe Analytics
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch, Kameleoon
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. Multiple language and regional versions available
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  6. Clear business and contact information present
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, ensuring scalability and content management efficiency. Integration with Cloudflare provides security and performance benefits. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and APIs (e.g., Sembo Inspire, Kameleoon) supports dynamic content and A/B testing. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to optimize loading times further. The technical stack is well-suited for a large transportation company, though continuous monitoring for technical debt and modernization is advised.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stenaline.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stenaline.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.