Skip to main content

Security report for steero.com

Steero · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Steero is a European platform connecting truck drivers with service locations such as parking, washing, and repair services. The platform facilitates transparent payments and aims to streamline operations for transport companies and service providers. The website is professionally designed using the Tilda CMS platform, with a focus on user experience and mobile optimization. It integrates modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain locks in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or privacy policies are published. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and functional digital presence for a small transportation-focused business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching steero.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Steero operates in the transportation sector, targeting truck drivers, transport companies, and service providers. Its business model centers on providing a digital network and payment platform to facilitate service access and transactions. The company has been established since 2014, with a domain age consistent with its business history. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its network reach and digital payment facilitation. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports brand visibility. The absence of explicit privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. The embedded Google Map and service location features enhance user engagement and operational transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and related EPP status flags. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, indicating gaps in formal security governance. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking, but no sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate with clear areas for improvement in policy transparency and domain security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy including incident response contact information.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Steero
Description
Steero is a platform and app connecting truck drivers with service locations such as truck parking, washing, and repair services across Europe. It facilitates easy and transparent payments between service providers and transport companies.
Key services
Truck parking, Truck washing, Truck repair, Digital payments, Network access for transport companies and service providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Tilda CMS scripts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Tilda website builder
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Tilda CMS with modern web technologies.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the main HTML content.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn with official company pages.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site.
  6. Google Maps embedded for service location visualization.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured but DNSSEC is missing.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No data protection officer contact information found.
  10. Website content is focused on transportation services for truck drivers and service providers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and various Tilda-specific scripts for UI and animations. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for analytics, marketing, and compliance. Hosting is via Amazon AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS servers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern fonts and CSS animations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but DNSSEC absence and lack of advanced security headers are noted.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with steero.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review steero.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.