Skip to main content

Security report for statyba.lt

Saulės spektras, UAB · Real Estate · Lithuania

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Statyba.lt is a comprehensive Lithuanian online business directory specializing in the construction sector, offering company listings, expert advice, job postings, and industry articles. Operated by Saulės spektras, UAB, it serves as a key platform for connecting construction-related businesses and consumers in Lithuania. The website demonstrates a solid market position with a broad range of services and active content updates. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Analytics, and Google Fonts, hosted by Hostex, but suffers from slow load times due to large page size and resource count. Security-wise, it employs TLS 1.2 with strong cipher suites but lacks TLS 1.3, HSTS, OCSP stapling, and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced security. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear user consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and mobile use, though performance improvements are advisable.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statyba.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Statyba.lt targets Lithuanian construction businesses and consumers, providing a multi-category directory including materials, services, tools, and expert consultations. Its business model revolves around advertising, listings, and content marketing. The platform benefits from partnerships with related domains such as saulesspektras.lt, which is also the parent company. The site shows growth indicators through frequent company updates, promotions, and active expert Q&A sections. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive sector coverage and localized focus. Revenue streams likely include advertising, premium listings, and sponsored content. The platform supports multiple languages, enhancing accessibility. Strategic observations suggest potential for expanding digital services and improving technical infrastructure to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The current security posture of statyba.lt is moderate. The site uses a valid SSL certificate with strong cipher suites and no known critical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Logjam. However, the absence of TLS 1.3, HSTS, OCSP stapling, DNSSEC, and CAA records indicates room for improvement in defense-in-depth. The SPF record is valid, and DMARC is set to 'none', which is minimal protection against email spoofing. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could hinder transparency and readiness. Data protection practices align with GDPR, supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Incident response channels and a data protection officer contact are not found, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with recommendations to enhance technical controls and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS.
  2. Upgrade SSL/TLS configuration to support TLS 1.3 for improved security and performance.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to optimize certificate revocation checks.
  4. Deploy DNSSEC and CAA records to protect DNS integrity and certificate issuance.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Saulės spektras, UAB
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform utilizing JavaScript, Bootstrap, jQuery UI, and CKEditor. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking and styling. Hosting is provided by Hostex, with DNS managed by their nameservers. Performance is currently slow, with a large page size (~678 KB) and over 100 resources loaded, suggesting optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and language localization. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. The SSL configuration is secure but lacks modern enhancements like TLS 1.3 and HSTS. The absence of DNSSEC and CAA records indicates potential technical debt. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but would benefit from modernization and performance tuning to reduce load times and enhance security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statyba.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statyba.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.