Skip to main content

Security report for stats.com

Stats Perform · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stats Perform is a leading enterprise in the sports data and AI industry, providing trusted Opta sports data, analytics, and fan engagement solutions to professional sports teams, media companies, broadcasters, and betting providers worldwide. The company leverages advanced technology and AI to deliver detailed sports insights and content for billions of fans globally. Their market position is strong, supported by a comprehensive suite of products and services tailored to various sports and betting markets. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with robust SEO, performance optimizations, and multi-language support, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though the absence of a public security policy and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which slightly impacts trust but does not negate the overall legitimacy indicated by the website's professional presentation and content. Overall, the risk is moderate with recommendations to enhance transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 23 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stats.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stats Perform operates in the technology and media sectors, focusing on sports data and AI-driven analytics. Their business model is B2B, serving professional sports organizations, media outlets, and betting companies. The company offers a wide range of services including live data feeds, AI-powered predictions, fan engagement tools, and content creation. Their competitive advantage lies in the depth and reliability of their data, combined with advanced AI capabilities. The website indicates a large enterprise with a global reach, supported by multiple language versions and extensive product offerings. Partnerships and subdomains suggest a well-integrated ecosystem. The company appears to be well-established since 2013, with consistent branding and high-quality content reinforcing their market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness perception. There is no evidence of a security.txt file or dedicated security page. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Marketo Forms is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and incident response information to build greater trust and compliance assurance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection officer contact details and GDPR compliance measures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stats Perform
Description
Top pro teams and media choose Stats Perform's trusted Opta sports data and AI to build magic from the detail of sport for billions of fans.
Key services
Opta sports data feeds, Sports AI and analytics, Fan engagement products, Betting and fantasy sports data, Content creation services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Weglot (translation), Snazzy Maps, WP Rocket (performance optimization), Marketo Forms
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Marketo Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong use of SEO and structured data for enhanced search presence
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via forms
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published
  6. WHOIS data missing or inaccessible, which reduces trust slightly
  7. Multiple language support via Weglot plugin
  8. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 4 framework, optimized for performance with WP Rocket and enhanced SEO via Yoast SEO plugin. It employs modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. Multi-language support is provided by Weglot, indicating a global audience focus. Hosting appears to be via WP Engine, a reputable managed WordPress host. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and skip links. Performance is fast with lazy loading and preconnect optimizations. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on multiple third-party scripts which require continuous security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, modern, and well-maintained, supporting the business's digital maturity and operational needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stats.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stats.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.