Skip to main content

Security report for statoil.com

Statoil · Oil & energy · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of statoil.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statoil.com

This scan found 9 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
85

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention statoil.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
468
Employees
35
Customers
290
Third parties
143
Weak passwords
32%

Latest record dated 2026-06-10 · 30 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for statoil.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fed-st.statoil.com2026-06-10
  • –guestportal.statoil.com2026-05-28
  • –spauth.statoil.com2026-05-28
  • –spauth.statoil.com2026-05-12
  • –t.statoil.com2026-01-11

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Equinor operates in the energy sector with a broad international footprint. Its business model centers on energy production and international operations, targeting stakeholders such as investors, partners, and the general public interested in energy solutions. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides detailed cookie consent information, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. The lack of visible contact details and official policy documents on the website suggests areas for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The technology stack and hosting choices reflect a mature digital strategy, supporting scalability and performance. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided content, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information indicates potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which could be a risk factor. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing detailed security policies, incident response procedures, and verified contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy page linked from the homepage.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  3. Provide verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  4. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact details.
  5. Review WHOIS registration details to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Equinor
Description
We are an international energy company headquartered in Norway, around 25,000 employees and with offices in more than 20 countries worldwide.
Key services
Energy production, International energy operations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cookiebot, Cloudflare (implied by cookies and scripts), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Siteimprove, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Siteimprove
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which is unusual for a large company
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Social media links not found in the provided HTML snippet
  8. Website is well optimized for mobile and accessibility
  9. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statoil.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statoil.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

statoil.com security report: 85/100, low risk | Guard