Skip to main content

Security report for stasher.com

Stasher · Transportation · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stasher is a UK-based company specializing in providing secure luggage storage services worldwide through a network of trusted shops and hotels. The platform offers travelers an affordable and convenient alternative to traditional station lockers, with 24/7 access and insured baggage storage. Their business model revolves around an online marketplace and mobile app that connects customers with local storage providers, positioning them as a leading player in the transportation and hospitality sectors. The company has a well-established online presence, supported by a domain registered since 2002, reflecting a mature and stable business. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with integration of Google Maps API for location services and Cloudflare for DNS and hosting. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with an active consent mechanism, indicating compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Tapfiliate are used responsibly with moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing vulnerability disclosure information. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website exhibiting high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency, adding incident response details, and considering a public vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen user trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stasher.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stasher operates in the niche market of luggage storage, targeting travelers and tourists who require secure and convenient storage solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in a global network of vetted storage locations, insurance coverage, and a user-friendly booking platform. Revenue streams likely include commissions from storage providers and direct customer bookings. The company’s growth is supported by a strong digital presence, mobile app availability, and active social media engagement. Partnerships with local businesses and integration with marketing and affiliate programs like Tapfiliate indicate a mature ecosystem. The business model is scalable and well-positioned to capitalize on increasing travel demand and the sharing economy trend.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks. Privacy compliance is evident through detailed policies and consent management. However, the lack of a published security policy and incident response contacts limits transparency and may impact user confidence in handling security incidents. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for mature security cultures. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing incident response and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stasher
Description
Stasher provides secure luggage storage services through trusted shops and hotels worldwide, offering an alternative to station lockers with 24/7 availability and insurance.
Key services
Luggage storage booking, 24/7 access to storage locations, Insured baggage storage, Mobile app for booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Maps API, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Tapfiliate
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Dwin1
Tracking pixels
Tapfiliate
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and CDN for performance.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Social media presence is active and consistent.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering for performance and SEO benefits. Integration with Google Maps API enhances location-based services. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site loads quickly and is mobile optimized, though accessibility is rated basic and could be improved. Use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing is well-managed with consent mechanisms in place. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or headless architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, scalable, and aligned with current web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stasher.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stasher.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.