Skip to main content

Security report for standortportal-bielefeld.de

WEGE Wirtschaftsförderung für Bielefeld GmbH · Real Estate · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website standortportal-bielefeld.de serves as a specialized commercial real estate portal for the Bielefeld region in Germany, operated by WEGE Wirtschaftsförderung für Bielefeld GmbH. It provides comprehensive listings and information on commercial properties and land for businesses seeking office, retail, industrial, or other commercial spaces. The platform also supports property owners, brokers, and project developers with listing and networking services. The site is professionally designed with a clear focus on its target audience of businesses and real estate stakeholders in Bielefeld. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks including Chakra UI and OpenLayers for mapping functionalities, with custom fonts enhancing branding. Hosting is managed via rzone.de, and the site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO practices are adequately implemented, though accessibility is basic. No major technical red flags were detected in the provided HTML content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML. However, it lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No cookie consent mechanism was found, which is a GDPR compliance gap. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers reduces transparency somewhat. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional portal for commercial real estate in Bielefeld, with room for improvement in security best practices and privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching standortportal-bielefeld.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention standortportal-bielefeld.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for standortportal-bielefeld.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal occupies a niche market position as a local commercial real estate platform in Bielefeld, targeting businesses seeking commercial spaces and property owners wishing to list their assets. Its business model revolves around providing a digital marketplace and networking platform, facilitating transactions and project development support. The presence of social media channels and official branding indicates an established local presence. Revenue streams likely include listing fees or service charges for property offerings. The platform supports multiple user segments including interested businesses, brokers, and owners, enhancing its ecosystem. The partnership with local entities such as citybielefeld.de suggests integration with municipal economic development efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit privacy/security policies indicates partial GDPR compliance. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, limiting transparency in security management. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and inform users about cookie usage.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  4. Provide direct company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WEGE Wirtschaftsförderung für Bielefeld GmbH
Description
Portal providing information and listings for commercial real estate, commercial land, and properties in Bielefeld. Offers overview of spaces for offices, retail, gastronomy, medical practices, warehouses, halls, production, labs, coworking spaces, and more.
Key services
Commercial property listings, Commercial land listings, Platform for offering properties, Support for interested businesses, Support for brokers and project developers, Support for property owners
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Chakra UI, OpenLayers (map library), Custom fonts (Inter, Barlow, Barlow Condensed)
Frameworks
Chakra UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a commercial real estate portal focused on Bielefeld region.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact likely via forms/buttons.
  4. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. WHOIS data limited but domain appears consistent with business purpose.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with Chakra UI for UI components and OpenLayers for map functionalities, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. Custom fonts are self-hosted, improving performance and branding consistency. Hosting via rzone.de suggests a standard shared or dedicated hosting environment. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with meta descriptions and structured content. There is no evidence of a CMS, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of cookie consent mechanisms, which could impact compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with standortportal-bielefeld.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review standortportal-bielefeld.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.