Skip to main content

Security report for standforukraine.com

Stand For Ukraine · Non-profit · Ukraine

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stand For Ukraine is a non-profit aggregator platform founded in 2022 that consolidates verified Ukrainian aid organizations to facilitate donations supporting military, humanitarian, medical, refugee, and press efforts amid the Russian invasion. The website serves a global audience of donors and supporters, providing multilingual access and direct links to trusted organizations with legal registration numbers. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted via Cloudflare, and optimized for mobile and SEO, delivering a fast and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements are needed in DNSSEC adoption and security headers. Privacy compliance is lacking due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with clear business credibility and a strong focus on transparency and verified information.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of standforukraine.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching standforukraine.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche as a trusted information hub and donation aggregator for Ukrainian aid organizations, leveraging verified legal entities to build donor confidence. Its business model is non-profit and informational, relying on partnerships with multiple humanitarian, military, and medical organizations. The site demonstrates consistent branding and content quality, targeting international donors and activists. Its partnership ecosystem includes numerous Ukrainian and international NGOs, foundations, and official entities. Growth indicators include multilingual support and active social media presence. Revenue streams are indirect, primarily through facilitating donations to partner organizations. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain donor trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, domain transfer lock, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid mitigation of potential security issues. Privacy compliance gaps, including missing privacy and cookie policies, expose the site to regulatory risks. The site does not appear to have vulnerabilities or malicious content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in headers, DNS security, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance user privacy by implementing a cookie consent mechanism and minimizing tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stand For Ukraine
Description
Aggregator of reliable organizations supporting Ukraine in response to Russian military aggression. Provides direct links to verified donation projects for military, humanitarian, medical, refugee, and press support.
Key services
Donation aggregation, Information dissemination, Multilingual support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Fonts, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-structured aggregator for verified Ukrainian aid organizations.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is actively maintained.
  7. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  9. Donation links lead to external verified organizations with legal registration numbers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging server-side rendering and modern JavaScript frameworks for performance and SEO benefits. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS, providing reliable and fast content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with deferred and async script loading. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, scalable, and well-implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with standforukraine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review standforukraine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.