Skip to main content

Security report for standard.ee

Standard · Real Estate · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Standard is a well-established Estonian company specializing in office and hospitality interior solutions, offering high-quality furniture and comprehensive services including design, manufacturing, and installation. The company targets B2B clients such as businesses, architects, and hotels, with a strong market presence supported by decades of experience and international exports. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress, leveraging modern technologies and SEO best practices to deliver a professional user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent compliance, and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates a trustworthy and credible business presence with room for enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching standard.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and hospitality sectors, focusing on B2B sales of office furniture and custom interior solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive experience, broad service offering from planning to after-sales, and a strong export footprint. The business model is project-based with a mix of manufacturing and sourcing from global brands. Partnerships and client references reinforce market credibility. The website supports growth through clear service descriptions, product catalogs, and multilingual support. Strategic observations include potential expansion of digital marketing and enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response information limits transparency. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by cookie consent but lacks a detailed privacy policy. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized documentation and contact channels for security incidents. Overall, the risk is low but improvements in policy disclosures are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation.
  2. Add explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for inclusivity.
  5. Implement security headers with reporting mechanisms and consider advanced CSP policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Standard
Description
Interjöörilahendused kontoritele ja hotellidele, pakkudes kvaliteetset kontorimööblit, eritellimusmööblit ja sisustuslahendusi. Teenused hõlmavad planeerimist, disaini, tootmist, paigaldust ja järelteenindust.
Key services
Sisustusprojektide planeerimine ja eelarvestamine, Erimööbli disain ja projekteerimine, Tootmine ja ostutoodete tellimine, Tarne, paigaldus ja järelteenindus
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js 10, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Law Info plugin, Rank Math SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed preferences
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by connect.facebook.net)
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed preferences.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Contact information includes a company email and contact form but no phone or physical address explicitly found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. WHOIS data is privacy protected but consistent with business legitimacy.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with up-to-date core and plugins, including jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching mechanisms evident. SEO is well-implemented using Rank Math plugin and structured data (JSON-LD). Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and language switching. Technical risks are minimal but depend on continued maintenance of third-party components and security updates. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header configurations for enhanced robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with standard.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review standard.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.