Skip to main content

Security report for stan.vision

StanVision · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StanVision is a specialized UI/UX agency focused on SaaS product and web design, targeting B2B SaaS companies and startups. The company offers a range of services including product design, website design, Webflow development, digital strategy, and support for growth. Their market position is that of a niche agency with a portfolio of startup success stories and recognized awards, indicating a strong reputation in their field. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Hotjar, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with excellent design and user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie banner present but no detailed privacy policy found in the provided content. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front, though improvements in security transparency and privacy documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stan.vision

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StanVision operates as a small, service-based agency within the technology sector, focusing exclusively on SaaS UI/UX design. Their business model revolves around providing design and development services to SaaS startups and companies, helping them accelerate product market fit and growth. The presence of awards and a curated portfolio suggests competitive advantages in quality and reputation. The company leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools to support marketing and user engagement. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and direct contact details may limit some trust signals. The agency appears to be well-positioned in a specialized niche with potential for growth through enhanced transparency and expanded service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. Use of asynchronous loading for tracking scripts reduces performance impact but also requires careful privacy management. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a cookie banner and no detailed privacy or data protection policies visible. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency website but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website, especially for security and support inquiries, to enhance trust and communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize user tracking risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
StanVision
Description
StanVision is a UI/UX agency for SaaS product design. Build B2B SaaS products that keep customers spending with great user experience.
Key services
Product Design, Website Design, Webflow Development, Digital Strategy, Support + Growth
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, JavaScript, Lottie animations, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Tolstoy Widget, Finsweet Attributes
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Tolstoy Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional UI/UX agency specializing in SaaS product design.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, likely privacy protected.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form only.
  4. Cookie banner present with consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including Lottie for animations and integrations with Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site uses CDN-hosted assets for performance optimization and asynchronous script loading to reduce page load times. Mobile optimization is excellent with responsive design and custom scrollbar styling. Accessibility features appear basic but adequate. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy documentation to reduce technical risks and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stan.vision. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stan.vision.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.