Skip to main content

Security report for staatsie.nl

Van der Lans & Busscher · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Van der Lans & Busscher is a specialized transportation service provider in the Netherlands, offering dignified state and funeral transport services since 1896. Their website reflects a well-established niche business with a clear focus on providing memorable and respectful transport options including traditional and alternative funeral vehicles. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and active social media channels. Technically, the website uses a modern JavaScript stack centered around jQuery and Font Awesome, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, DNSSEC, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, supporting the company’s market position as a reputable funeral transport provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching staatsie.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, specifically focusing on funeral and state transport services. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting individuals and organizations requiring specialized funeral vehicles. The long history since 1896 positions them as a trusted market player. Revenue likely derives from vehicle rental and transport services. The website’s content and social media presence indicate a focus on quality and respect, appealing to a sensitive customer segment. Partnerships with web agencies and use of cookie consent tools show attention to compliance and digital maturity. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent small business.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, CSRF tokens on forms, and cookie consent management. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could be a gap in transparency. The absence of security headers like CSP or HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Google Analytics is used with consent, indicating moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing policies and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Van der Lans & Busscher
Description
Van der Lans & Busscher biedt sinds 1896 bijzonder staatsievervoer aan. Ontdek onze uitgebreide collectie rouwauto's en volgauto's voor een waardig afscheid.
Key services
Rouwauto's (funeral cars), Volgauto's (escort cars), Alternative funeral transport options
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.3, Font Awesome 6, fslightbox, jquery.datetimepicker, jquery.tooltipster, jquery.spamShield, jquery.confirmbox, cookieFirst consent management
Frameworks
jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Spam protection on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieFirst consent management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the funeral transportation industry.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with a clear banner and options.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports business credibility.
  7. Forms include spam protection and CSRF tokens.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected.
  9. SEO and metadata are well implemented with Open Graph and Twitter cards.
  10. No structured JSON-LD data found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a primarily jQuery-based technology stack with additional plugins for UI components and consent management. The presence of Font Awesome icons and fslightbox for media display enhances user experience. The site is hosted under a Dutch registrar with DNSSEC enabled, indicating good domain security. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip links and responsive design. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter cards, but no JSON-LD structured data was found. The CMS is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with staatsie.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review staatsie.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.