Staab Architekten is a German architecture firm specializing in cultural, institutional, and public building projects. Their website showcases a portfolio of award-winning projects, including museums, seminar buildings, and cultural centers, targeting clients in the real estate and cultural sectors. The firm positions itself as a reputable medium-sized architecture practice with a strong presence in Germany. Technically, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web standards, though no CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. Business credibility is supported by professional content and contact information, though WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve in security and privacy disclosures.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
79
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention staab-architekten.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for staab-architekten.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Staab Architekten operates in the architecture and real estate sector, focusing on high-profile cultural and institutional projects. Their business model revolves around architectural design services and participation in competitions. The firm demonstrates strong market positioning through awards and notable projects. The website indicates partnerships with landscape architects and engineering firms. The target audience includes public institutions, cultural organizations, and private clients seeking architectural expertise. Growth indicators include recent project completions and awards. The firm maintains a professional digital presence with social media engagement and detailed project documentation.
Security posture
The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which is a gap for transparency and preparedness. No forms with sensitive data collection are present on the main pages, reducing immediate risk. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, policies, and compliance mechanisms.
Recommendations
Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about cookie usage.
Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve transparency and trust.
Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities or outdated components.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Staab Architekten
Description
Staab Architekten is an architecture firm specializing in cultural, institutional, and public buildings with a focus on architectural design and urban planning. They showcase projects such as museums, seminar buildings, cultural centers, and restoration works.
Key services
Architectural design, Urban planning, Project management, Restoration and renovation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS usage (assumed from URL)
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed with rich content about architectural projects.
No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage or main news articles.
No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite cookie setting script.
Contact information is available but no phone numbers explicitly found in provided content.
Social media presence includes Instagram link.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
No visible security or incident response policies published.
WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, reducing transparency.
No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without heavy frameworks or CMS detected. It uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization and includes meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). Performance appears moderate with optimized images and lazy loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided HTML snippet, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider and backend technologies are not identifiable from the HTML. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with staab-architekten.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review staab-architekten.com.