Skip to main content

Security report for srins.co.uk

SR Insurance Services · Transportation · United Kingdom

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SR Insurance Services is an independent insurance consultancy based in Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK, providing a wide range of insurance products including property, motor, taxi and fleet, landlord, marine, commercial, personal, performance, charity, and travel insurance. The company targets individuals and businesses across the United Kingdom, positioning itself as a local expert with competitive premiums and personalized service. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and contact information, supporting its market position as a trusted small business in the insurance sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, Smart Slider 3, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting is provided by Heart Internet Limited, a reputable UK hosting provider. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no major technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, alongside a cookie consent mechanism indicating some privacy awareness. However, it lacks explicit security headers, a published security policy, incident response contacts, and a privacy policy, which are important for compliance and trust. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected in the content or scripts. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional policies and headers. The overall risk assessment is low, with the main recommendations focusing on enhancing privacy compliance by adding a privacy policy and terms of service, implementing security headers, and publishing incident response information. These improvements would strengthen trust and regulatory compliance, supporting the company’s credibility and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srins.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SR Insurance Services operates as a small, independent insurance consultancy serving a niche market in the UK, particularly Suffolk and Lowestoft. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized service and a broad insurance offering tailored to property owners, vehicle owners, businesses, and charitable organizations. The business model is consultancy and brokerage, generating revenue through insurance premiums and commissions. The website indicates a focus on local and regional customers, with no evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website and a diverse service portfolio. The company appears to maintain a straightforward operational model without complex partnerships or external dependencies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA implemented to protect user input forms. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism shows awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the defense-in-depth posture. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor dedicated contact channels for security incidents, which limits preparedness and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and terms of service pages, which are critical for GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SR Insurance Services
Description
Independent insurance consultants based in Lowestoft, Suffolk, offering insurance cover for property, car, taxi, business, and more across the United Kingdom.
Key services
Taxi and Fleet Insurance, Landlord Insurance, Motor Insurance, Gap Insurance, Marine Insurance, Commercial and Liability Insurance, Personal and Household Insurance, Performance and Charity Insurance, Travel Insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Smart Slider 3, Google Fonts, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
PHP (implied by WordPress), JavaScript
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using WordPress and Divi theme.
  2. Clear navigation with dedicated pages for various insurance services.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed including phone and email.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented inline.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the Divi theme providing a flexible and visually appealing design. The use of Smart Slider 3 enhances visual engagement. External resources include Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating integration with trusted third-party services. Hosting by Heart Internet Limited suggests reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with no critical issues detected, though optimization opportunities exist. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Technical risks are minimal but include potential outdated plugins or themes if not maintained. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with scope for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srins.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srins.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.