Skip to main content

Security report for srf-org.se

SRF · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SRF is a Swedish industry association representing over 300 travel agencies and travel organizers. The organization focuses on advocacy, legal guidance, education, and member support within the travel sector. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with standard SEO and analytics tools, targeting Swedish travel businesses and stakeholders. The domain is well-established since 2007, registered with a reputable Swedish registrar, aligning with the organization's claims. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced DNS security and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves as a credible resource for its members and the travel industry in Sweden.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srf-org.se

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SRF holds a strong market position as a key representative body for the Swedish travel industry, leveraging partnerships with European organizations like ECTAA. Its business model is membership-based, providing advocacy, education, and industry standards enforcement. The organization targets travel agencies, event organizers, and related businesses, offering legal advice and training. The website supports these functions with relevant content, event listings, and member resources. The association's longevity and clear contact information enhance its credibility. No direct revenue streams are visible on the site, consistent with a non-profit or industry association model.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and standard security practices such as cookie consent. However, it lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers, which could improve protection against DNS spoofing and clickjacking. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which limits transparency on handling security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate plugin-related risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional measures and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Svenska Resebranschföreningen
Registration number
802015-0358
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SRF
Description
Vi bevakar branschgemensamma frågor och påverkar riksdag, regering och offentliga myndigheter när det gäller utredningar och lagförslag. SRF företräder drygt 300 svenska reseföretag och ger medlemmar råd, utbildningar samt följer uppförandekod och rekommendationer.
Key services
Industry advocacy, Legal and regulatory advice, Education and training, Member support, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional association site for Swedish travel agencies.
  2. Content is in Swedish with some English sections for international audiences.
  3. Uses standard WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  4. Includes cookie consent banner and privacy policy.
  5. No visible security or incident response policies.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled on domain.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a mature and maintainable CMS environment. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Hosting appears to be with Loopia AB, a Swedish provider consistent with the domain registrar. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and accessibility improvements are recommended to future-proof the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srf-org.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srf-org.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.