Skip to main content

Security report for srdcenadlani.cz

Srdce na dlani, nadační fond · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Srdce na dlani is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting children from children's homes through motivational programs, assistance for independent living, and educational activities. The organization has a clear mission and a network of partners, with a website that reflects its charitable focus and community engagement. The site provides contact information and showcases partner logos, indicating established relationships within the sector. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with jQuery and Lightbox for UI enhancements. The site is mobile-optimized and features good navigation and content structure, although some accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its non-profit purpose, but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance documentation, improved security headers, and verified domain registration information to strengthen its security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srdcenadlani.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector focused on child welfare and education in the Czech Republic. It leverages partnerships with various companies and organizations to support its programs. The business model relies on donations and collaborations, targeting children in children's homes and donors/supporters. The website content and partner ecosystem indicate a stable market position within the charitable community. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and annual reports. The foundation's operations appear transparent with clear contact details and partner acknowledgments, supporting donor confidence and engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to strengthen domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Srdce na dlani, nadační fond
Registration number
28196112
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Srdce na dlani, nadační fond
Description
Nadační fond Srdce na dlani supports children from children's homes through motivational programs, assistance for independent living, and educational activities.
Key services
Motivační program, Pomoc do samostatného života, Vzdělávací aktivity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, Lightbox, Custom CSS/JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found despite cookie consent mechanism
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  5. Multiple partner logos and external links to reputable organizations
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  7. No forms detected on homepage content
  8. Contact email and physical address clearly provided in footer
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking, jQuery and Lightbox for UI components, and custom CSS/JS for styling and interactivity. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports the foundation's mission effectively but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srdcenadlani.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srdcenadlani.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.