Skip to main content

Security report for spin-on.fr

Spin On · Technology · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spin On is a small, professional web agency based in Besançon, France, specializing in the creation of websites, e-commerce platforms, mobile applications, and custom software development. The company has been operating since 2013 and serves primarily local and regional businesses. Their website demonstrates a solid digital presence with a focus on GDPR compliance and user privacy, evidenced by the integration of Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The agency leverages modern web technologies and frameworks such as WordPress, Drupal, Prestashop, and Laravel to deliver tailored solutions to clients. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including JavaScript libraries like jQuery, TweenMax, and Rellax for enhanced user experience and performance optimizations such as lazy loading. Hosting is provided via DigitalOcean, a reputable cloud provider, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, although accessibility features are basic and could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, but lacks explicit security headers and documented security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics indicates moderate user tracking, balanced with GDPR compliance. Overall, Spin On presents a trustworthy and professional digital footprint with room for improvement in security hardening and accessibility. The domain registration data aligns well with the business profile, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving accessibility compliance to strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spin-on.fr

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spin On operates as a regional web development agency with a clear focus on custom digital solutions including e-commerce and mobile applications. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise with multiple popular CMS and frameworks, enabling them to cater to diverse client needs. The business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and professionals in the Franche-Comté region. The presence of client references and partnerships with known brands like Banque Populaire Bourgogne Franche-Comté and Nutrisens suggests a solid client base and market credibility. Growth indicators include a decade-long domain age and integration of modern marketing tools. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable third-party services for analytics and cookie management, enhancing operational efficiency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Cookiebot. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for improvement. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics introduces tracking but is managed with user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, suggesting a low immediate risk. Enhancing security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers would elevate the security posture and compliance with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spin On
Description
Notre agence web en Franche-Comté réalise et conçoit des sites internet vitrine, e-commerce et sur-mesure. Nous travaillons essentiellement avec Wordpress, Drupal, Prestashop et Laravel...
Key services
Website creation, E-commerce solutions, Mobile applications, Custom software development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, TweenMax, Rellax, LazySizes, Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
WordPress, Drupal, Prestashop, Laravel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and Facebook Pixel usage)
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional web agency based in Besançon, France.
  2. Uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management.
  3. Integrates Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Website content is in French and targets local/regional businesses.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. Good use of modern JavaScript libraries and lazy loading for performance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript enhanced by libraries such as jQuery, TweenMax, and Rellax for animations and lazy loading for performance optimization. It supports multiple CMS platforms including WordPress, Drupal, Prestashop, and Laravel, indicating flexibility in development. Hosting is managed by DigitalOcean, a reliable cloud provider. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate, benefiting from asynchronous script loading and optimized assets. Technical risks are minimal but could arise from missing security headers and lack of documented security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spin-on.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spin-on.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.