Skip to main content

Security report for spelberoendegruppen.com

Non-profit · Sweden

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website spelberoendegruppen.com represents a small, established non-profit organization focused on providing support and self-help resources for individuals affected by gambling addiction and their relatives, primarily in Sweden with some Swedish-speaking groups in Finland. The organization emphasizes anonymity and peer support through local groups and digital channels. The site is hosted on WordPress.com, leveraging WordPress and Jetpack technologies, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity suitable for a non-profit entity. The content is relevant, well-structured, and accessible, with clear contact channels including phone, SMS, email, and a contact form. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap with GDPR and related regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spelberoendegruppen.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention spelberoendegruppen.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for spelberoendegruppen.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, targeting a niche audience of gambling addicts and their families. Its business model revolves around community support and education rather than commercial revenue. The domain age (since 2009) supports its legitimacy and long-term presence. The website links to multiple local self-help groups, indicating a decentralized support network. The use of WordPress.com hosting and Jetpack tools suggests cost-effective digital infrastructure. The lack of advanced security policies or certifications is typical for small non-profits but represents an area for improvement. The organization maintains a modest but clear online presence with social sharing options but no direct social media profiles linked.

Security posture

The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain status locks that protect against unauthorized domain changes. However, no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The contact form is implemented via Jetpack, which generally provides secure form handling, but no explicit incident response or security policy information is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also reflects incomplete compliance with data protection best practices. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against attacks.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Vi är en ideell riksorganisation som finns till för att hjälpa spelberoende och anhöriga. Alla medlemmar och engagerade inom organisationen har egen erfarenhet av att vara spelberoende eller anhörig. Anonymiteten är viktigaste principen inom verksamheten.
Key services
Support for gambling addicts and relatives, Self-help groups information and facilitation, Contact and counseling via phone, SMS, email, and contact form, Organizing lectures and help to start self-help groups
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack plugin, Gutenberg block editor, WordPress.com hosting
Frameworks
Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats Pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack Sharing Buttons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit support organization for gambling addiction.
  2. Content is in Swedish with some links to Swedish-speaking groups in Finland.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, SMS, email, and contact form.
  5. Website uses WordPress.com hosting and Jetpack plugin features.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  8. Social media links limited to sharing buttons for Facebook and X (Twitter).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress hosted on WordPress.com, using the Gutenberg editor and Jetpack plugin for enhanced functionality including contact forms and sharing buttons. The site loads external resources from WordPress.com domains and uses standard web fonts and emoji support. Performance is moderate with basic SEO and accessibility features. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The technical setup is appropriate for a small non-profit but could be improved with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spelberoendegruppen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spelberoendegruppen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.