Skip to main content

Security report for speed3.lv

SIA "Speed 3" · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Speed 3" is a Latvian automotive service company established in 1997, specializing in car painting, detailing, aerography, and protective coatings. The company holds accreditations from recognized brands such as Gtechniq and Sonax, positioning itself as a reputable local service provider with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. Their business model combines local service offerings with an online store for automotive care products. The website is built on WordPress with a Bootstrap framework, providing a moderate level of technical maturity and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the business information and online presence suggest a legitimate operation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching speed3.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and retail sectors, targeting vehicle owners in Latvia seeking high-quality automotive repair and maintenance services. Their competitive advantage lies in long-standing market presence, accreditations from premium automotive brands, and a diversified service portfolio including detailing and protective coatings. Revenue streams likely include service fees and product sales via their online store. Partnerships with brands like Sonax, Gtechniq, and Ultracoat strengthen their market position and product offerings. The website supports multilingual access (Latvian, English, Russian), indicating an intent to serve a broader regional audience. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded e-commerce capabilities.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No visible forms on the homepage reduce immediate attack surface, but absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, posing GDPR compliance risks given the EU jurisdiction. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed privacy policy updates to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information and consider using privacy protection if justified, ensuring consistency with business claims.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Speed 3"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Speed 3"
Description
Uzņēmums darbojas kopš 1997. gada 13. janvāra un ir specializējies uz auto remontu, krāsošanu, detalizētu auto apkopi un vizuālo tūningu. Piedāvā profesionālas auto krāsošanas, aerogrāfijas, auto apkopi un detaļas pulēšanu. Ir Gtechniq, Sonax un Ultracoat akreditēti detaileri un materiālu izplatītāji.
Key services
auto krāsošana, aerogrāfija, auto apkope un detaļu pulēšana, auto aizsargpārklājumu uzklāšana, auto aizsargplēvju PPF uzstādīšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, WordPress, WooCommerce, UnoSlider, WPGlobus
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based automotive service provider site in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with language switcher for English and Russian.
  3. No visible privacy or cookie consent banners despite GDPR relevance.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  6. Uses HTTPS with no visible security headers.
  7. Includes social media links to Instagram and Facebook.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
  9. Partner logos and links to known automotive product brands present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and uses plugins such as WPGlobus for multilingual support and UnoSlider for interactive sliders. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs like ajax.googleapis.com. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. SEO optimization is basic, with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with speed3.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review speed3.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.