Skip to main content

Security report for sostena.lt

UAB SOSTENA · Transportation · Lithuania

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB SOSTENA is a Lithuanian automotive dealership company representing multiple well-known car brands including Volvo, Renault, Dacia, and Lynk & Co. The company operates a professional website that serves as a corporate landing page linking to brand-specific subdomains and providing essential contact and corporate information. The website is designed with modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery and incorporates a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, demonstrating compliance with GDPR and privacy regulations. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. From a technical perspective, the website uses a modern tech stack with responsive design and basic accessibility features. The presence of Google Consent Mode and Cookiebot indicates a mature approach to user privacy and consent management. However, some security best practices such as HTTP security headers are not visibly implemented, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of third-party analytics and advertising networks is transparent and managed through consent. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain registration analysis, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate and established business presence. Overall, the website is professional, compliant, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security header implementation and publishing of security policies. Strategic recommendations include enhancing HTTP security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts and cookies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sostena.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sostena.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sostena.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UAB SOSTENA holds a solid market position as a multi-brand automotive dealer in Lithuania, targeting both individual and corporate customers. The business model focuses on vehicle sales and servicing for premium and mainstream automotive brands. The website reflects a well-structured digital presence with clear branding consistency and links to multiple brand-specific subdomains, indicating a diversified portfolio. The company leverages partnerships with digital experience providers like Modera and uses industry-standard cookie consent tools to ensure compliance. Revenue streams likely include vehicle sales, after-sales services, and possibly financing or leasing options. The presence of a career opportunities link suggests organizational growth and investment in human capital. The company maintains a transparent contact ecosystem, including a designated data protection officer, which supports regulatory compliance and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. Google Consent Mode is configured to deny ad and analytics storage by default, enhancing privacy protection. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security indicates room for improvement. No dedicated security policy or incident response information is published, which could impact incident handling readiness. The use of third-party analytics and advertising services is managed transparently with user consent. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and periodically review cookie consent configurations to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB SOSTENA
VAT number
LT100000954514
Registration number
300019733
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB SOSTENA
Description
UAB SOSTENA is a company operating in Lithuania, primarily engaged in automotive sales and services, representing brands such as Volvo, Renault, Dacia, and Lynk & Co. The website serves as a corporate landing page linking to brand-specific subdomains and providing contact and corporate information.
Key services
Automobile sales, Automobile servicing, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.1.1, jQuery 3.3.1, Popper.js 1.14.3, Cookiebot CMP, Google Consent Mode
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • Google Consent Mode configured to deny ad and analytics storage by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Adform, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot session pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Google Consent Mode
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  2. No WHOIS data could be extracted due to query limit exceeded error.
  3. Website content is in Lithuanian and targets local automotive customers.
  4. Multiple brand subdomains linked from main site indicating multi-brand dealership.
  5. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address clearly provided.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  7. No explicit terms of service page detected.
  8. Use of modern frontend libraries and frameworks.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 4.1.1, jQuery 3.3.1, and Popper.js 1.14.3, indicating a stable and widely supported frontend technology stack. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Google Consent Mode is used to control data collection and advertising personalization. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good navigation clarity. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimization indicators. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but no advanced features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta charset and viewport tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sostena.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sostena.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.