Skip to main content

Security report for soskinderdorpen.nl

SOS Kinderdorpen · Non-profit · Netherlands

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SOS Kinderdorpen is a well-established non-profit organization based in the Netherlands focused on strengthening families to ensure children grow up in loving and safe environments. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear messaging aimed at donors, supporters, and stakeholders interested in child welfare. The organization leverages multiple digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience effectively while maintaining GDPR compliance through a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and integrates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot, ensuring a good level of digital maturity and performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although additional security headers could enhance protection. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness appropriate for a large non-profit entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035
    • Medium

      Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

      Domain can be transferred without authorization

      What to do: Enable domain transfer lock for security

Keep watching soskinderdorpen.nl

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention soskinderdorpen.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
9%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for soskinderdorpen.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SOS Kinderdorpen operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on child welfare and family support. Its business model relies on donor engagement and public support, reflected in the website's content and calls to action. The organization maintains a strong market position in the Netherlands with a consistent brand and active social media presence. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools indicates a strategic approach to audience targeting and growth. However, the absence of explicit contact details and terms of service on the homepage suggests areas for improvement in transparency and user engagement. The website's integration with multiple external domains for analytics and marketing is typical for non-profits seeking broad outreach and impact measurement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The presence of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to manage supply chain risks. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information represents a compliance gap and an opportunity to enhance trust and readiness. Implementing additional security headers and a security.txt file would further strengthen the security framework. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively but could benefit from formalizing its security governance and incident response capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate supply chain risks and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SOS Kinderdorpen
Description
SOS Kinderdorpen versterkt families zodat kinderen liefdevol en veilig kunnen opgroeien binnen hun eigen familie.
Key services
Family strengthening programs, Child welfare support, Donor engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Quantcast
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Hotjar, Quantcast
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. Privacy policy is present and detailed, supporting GDPR compliance
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content provided
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent
  7. Good SEO and metadata implementation including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress and uses a combination of JavaScript libraries and third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, and Visual Website Optimizer. The site employs modern SEO practices with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints to optimize resource fetching. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses responsive design principles. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence suitable for a large non-profit organization, though there is room for modernization and enhanced security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soskinderdorpen.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soskinderdorpen.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.