Skip to main content

Security report for sosbernuciemati.lv

Latvijas SOS Bērnu ciematu asociācija · Non-profit · Latvia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas SOS Bērnu ciematu asociācija is a Latvian non-profit organization established in 1997, dedicated to creating and supporting SOS families for children without parental care and assisting families in crisis through support centers. The organization operates primarily in Latvia and targets children in need, families facing crises, and donors interested in charitable giving. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and relevant information about its mission and services. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for cookie consent, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and security best practices observed, though explicit privacy and terms of service policies are not found, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, safe, and compliant with basic privacy mechanisms, but could enhance transparency and user trust by publishing detailed privacy and security policies and providing clear contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sosbernuciemati.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a solid market position as a recognized SOS Children’s Villages association member in Latvia, operating since 1997. Its business model is non-profit, relying on donations and charitable support to provide family and child welfare services. The target customer segments include vulnerable children, families in crisis, and philanthropic donors. The website integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, indicating active engagement in digital outreach and fundraising. The absence of direct contact details and formal policies suggests potential gaps in user engagement and compliance transparency. The partnership ecosystem includes major platforms like Google and Facebook for analytics and marketing, but no direct business partner domains were identified. Growth indicators are positive given the long-standing presence and digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. Security headers are likely present given the use of Cloudflare services, enhancing protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information limits the organization's readiness transparency. There are no visible vulnerabilities or malware indicators. Compliance gaps include missing explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are critical for GDPR and NIS2 compliance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by formalizing policies and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to enhance transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Provide clear contact information including dedicated security incident response contacts.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas SOS Bērnu ciematu asociācija
Description
Latvijas SOS Bērnu ciematu asociācija ir labdarības organizācija, kas kopš 1997. gada veido un atbalsta SOS ģimenes bērniem, kas palikuši bez savu vecāku gādības, kā arī SOS ģimeņu atbalsta centros palīdz ģimenēm, kas nonākušas krīzes situācijās.
Key services
SOS family creation and support, Support centers for families in crisis, Charitable donations and fundraising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, Google Optimize, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Facebook domain verification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Google Optimize, Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. Good SSL and security header posture inferred
  7. Content is relevant to non-profit child welfare and family support
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, and Facebook SDK. It integrates third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized CSS. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicit but Cloudflare services are inferred. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of explicit privacy and terms pages and contact info represents a compliance and trust risk. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and formalize compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sosbernuciemati.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sosbernuciemati.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.