Skip to main content

Security report for songforthemute.com

Song for the Mute · Retail · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Song for the Mute is a niche fashion brand that presents its collections as long-form stories, targeting discerning fashion consumers interested in artistic and narrative-driven apparel. The website showcases seasonal collections for menswear, womenswear, and accessories, including special releases and collaborations such as with Adidas. The brand positions itself as a high-end, storytelling-driven retailer with a strong emphasis on design and fabric experimentation. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks like Gatsby and React, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Klaviyo. The site is mobile optimized and provides a smooth user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and business credibility, though the website content and branding appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site is well-constructed but would benefit from improved security disclosures and more transparent business contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching songforthemute.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention songforthemute.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for songforthemute.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the retail and e-commerce sectors, focusing on high-end fashion with a unique storytelling approach. Its business model is direct-to-consumer, leveraging seasonal chapters and special releases to engage customers. The brand maintains a consistent and professional online presence with active social media engagement, particularly on Instagram. Marketing efforts include retargeting and email campaigns via Klaviyo, supported by analytics and user behavior tracking. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable gap, but the brand's digital maturity is evident through its use of modern web technologies and marketing integrations. The company targets fashion-conscious consumers who value narrative and design innovation, positioning itself as a boutique label with artistic credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. The use of multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing increases the attack surface and requires ongoing monitoring. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  4. Provide direct company contact information such as verified business emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Song for the Mute
Description
Song for the Mute is a fashion brand presenting collections as long-form stories with male and female casts, seasons as chapters, and narratives told through fabrics and experimental processes.
Key services
Menswear, Womenswear, Accessories, Special releases, Collaborations (e.g., Adidas)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Klaviyo
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and marketing tools.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  7. No adult or questionable content present.
  8. Social media presence on Instagram is prominent.
  9. No phone numbers or direct email addresses found; contact via form and social media.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack using Gatsby and React, providing a fast and responsive user experience. It integrates with multiple analytics and marketing platforms including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Klaviyo, enabling extensive user tracking and marketing automation. The site appears to be hosted on a platform compatible with Shopify, as indicated by asset URLs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features, though some accessibility improvements could be made. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript best practices, but lacks some security headers that could improve overall security posture. The technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with songforthemute.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review songforthemute.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.