Skip to main content

Security report for solidariteukraine.ch

Solidarité Ukraine, Genève · Non-profit · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solidarité Ukraine, Genève is a small non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Ukrainian refugees in Geneva. The website provides hotline services, social and administrative assistance, accommodation offers, and volunteer engagement opportunities. It targets both refugees and local residents willing to help. The organization appears to be well-positioned locally with a clear humanitarian mission and bilingual content in French and Ukrainian. The website uses WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and React vendor scripts, and employs SEO and multilingual plugins to enhance accessibility and reach. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and email obfuscation, but visible PHP warnings indicate minor backend issues that should be addressed. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of a privacy policy, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve in security hygiene and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solidariteukraine.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit humanitarian sector, focusing on refugee support in Geneva. Its business model revolves around providing social services and facilitating community engagement. The website's content and structured data confirm its local focus and mission. The use of multilingual support and hotline services indicates a user-centric approach. There is no evidence of commercial activities or revenue streams beyond donations and volunteer coordination. The organization benefits from partnerships with Hospice général Genève, enhancing its legitimacy. Growth indicators include active content updates and multilingual accessibility. The partnership ecosystem appears limited but focused on local social services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of security-related plugins such as email encoder and cookie notice. However, the presence of PHP warnings in the HTML output reveals minor backend misconfigurations that could expose information or cause instability. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. Security headers are not fully confirmed, suggesting room for improvement. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses obfuscation for emails, but formalizing security policies and fixing backend warnings would enhance its security posture. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to missing privacy policy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Fix PHP warnings in the theme files to prevent information leakage and improve stability.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure mechanism (e.g., security.txt).
  4. Audit and enhance HTTP security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  5. Regularly update and monitor plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solidarité Ukraine, Genève
Description
Hospice général Solidarité Ukraine Hotline Genève famille d'accueil permis S hébergement logement réfugié accueil bénévolat santé urgence
Key services
Hotline support, Social and administrative assistance, Accommodation offers, Volunteer engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Bootstrap 5, jQuery, React (vendor scripts), WPML (multilingual plugin), Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice plugin, Email Encoder Bundle
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Email addresses obfuscated via Email Encoder Bundle
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., Cookie Notice)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit humanitarian aid platform focused on Ukrainian refugees in Geneva.
  2. Content is bilingual (French and Ukrainian) targeting local and refugee audiences.
  3. Uses WordPress with common plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and forms.
  4. Some PHP warnings visible in HTML indicating minor backend issues.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is present.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including hotline phone and email.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, React vendor scripts, and multiple plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and forms. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Some technical debt is evident from PHP warnings in the theme header, indicating incomplete or faulty code. The site uses standard SEO practices with Yoast SEO and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses WPML for language management and Contact Form 7 for user interactions. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires code cleanup and security hardening to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solidariteukraine.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solidariteukraine.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.