Institut Solidarische Moderne · Non-profit · Germany
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.
Institut Solidarische Moderne is a German non-profit think tank and platform focused on developing progressive political concepts through dialogue among parties, movements, trade unions, civil society, and academia. The organization offers analysis, publications, podcasts, events, and forums to promote social-ecological transformation and solidarity politics. Their business model relies on memberships and donations, emphasizing independence and community engagement. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-structured, targeting progressive political actors and the general public interested in leftist political discourse. Technically, the website is built on the KONTEXT-CMS platform, uses modern frontend technologies like Tailwind CSS and jQuery, and is hosted via Warenform DNS servers. It features responsive design and good SEO practices. Analytics are implemented via Matomo with a GDPR-compliant opt-in cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a mature approach to privacy and data protection. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and published security policies are missing. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses cookie consent with opt-in for tracking, and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which could be improved. The WHOIS data is limited but consistent with a small non-profit organization using CMS hosting services. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the site is fully accessible. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy, professional, and privacy-conscious platform for political discourse. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies, enhancing security headers, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention solidarische-moderne.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for solidarische-moderne.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with solidarische-moderne.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solidarische-moderne.de.