Skip to main content

Security report for solera.nl

Solera Nederland · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solera Nederland operates as a provider of smart data and software solutions tailored for the automotive and insurance industries. The company positions itself as a significant player in these sectors, delivering B2B services that enhance operational efficiency and data intelligence. The website reflects a professional presence with consistent branding and a focus on industry-specific solutions, targeting automotive and insurance professionals primarily in the Netherlands. The business model centers on software and data delivery, leveraging digital platforms to engage its audience. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing modern web technologies including Typekit fonts, Google Fonts, and integrations with marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility features and SEO optimization. Hosting is managed via Squarespace's CDN, ensuring reliable delivery. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as HSTS and Content-Security-Policy suggests room for improvement in hardening the security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be enhanced to build trust and readiness. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with no critical vulnerabilities detected. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is common but reduces transparency. The site’s social media presence and marketing integrations support its legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear privacy and security policies, and expanding contact options to include verified company emails.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solera.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Solera Nederland is positioned as an essential entity within the transportation and insurance sectors, focusing on delivering smart data and software solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized industry knowledge and digital service delivery. The business model is B2B, targeting automotive and insurance companies requiring data-driven software tools. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing, data services, and possibly consulting. The target customer segments include automotive service providers, insurers, and related enterprises primarily in the Netherlands. Growth indicators include active marketing via Marketo and social media engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes major social platforms but no explicit business partners are identified on the site. Operationally, the company maintains a professional digital presence with consistent branding and moderate content quality.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the lack of critical HTTP security headers like HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy indicates incomplete implementation of best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance gaps exist in the publication of privacy policies and terms of service. The security culture appears to prioritize user privacy through consent but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls. Overall, the risk of security incidents is moderate but manageable with improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and configure HTTP security headers including Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service page to improve transparency and regulatory compliance.
  3. Establish and publicly share an incident response policy and dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and navigation clarity to improve user experience and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Solera Nederland
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solera Nederland
Description
WE DELIVER SMART DATA AND SOFTWARE TO THE AUTOMOTIVE & INSURANCE INDUSTRY
Key services
Smart data delivery, Software solutions for automotive industry, Software solutions for insurance industry
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Typekit fonts, Google Fonts (Roboto), OneTrust cookie consent, Marketo Munchkin tracking, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo video embed
Frameworks
Squarespace platform
Platforms
Squarespace CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of OneTrust for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin
Marketing tools
Marketo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with professional design
  2. Cookie consent is managed by OneTrust with detailed preference center
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Contact information includes phone number and physical address but no email
  5. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Spotify
  6. Use of marketing and analytics tools like Marketo and Google Tag Manager
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Squarespace CMS, which provides a stable and scalable infrastructure with integrated CDN hosting. The technology stack includes modern web fonts from Typekit and Google Fonts, video embedding via Vimeo, and marketing integrations with Marketo and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Technical debt appears low due to the use of a managed platform, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility compliance. Overall, the infrastructure supports business operations effectively but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solera.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solera.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.