Skip to main content

Security report for soasta.com

Akamai Technologies · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

69/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akamai Technologies operates a comprehensive website showcasing its leadership in cloud computing, cybersecurity, and content delivery services. The company targets enterprise clients requiring robust, scalable, and secure digital infrastructure solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with extensive product offerings, multilingual support, and advanced technical implementations including Adobe Experience Manager and React frameworks. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not prominently published. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness consistent with a global technology leader.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soasta.com

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
69

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Akamai is positioned as a leading enterprise technology provider specializing in cloud computing, security, and CDN services. Its business model focuses on B2B SaaS and infrastructure solutions, serving industries such as media, finance, healthcare, and gaming. The company leverages partnerships (e.g., Linode for cloud management) and maintains a strong ecosystem of products and solutions. The website content and structure support a broad target audience of IT professionals and business decision-makers, emphasizing security, performance, and innovation. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy or registry policies and does not detract from the company's credibility.

Security posture

The website employs modern security best practices including HTTPS, multiple security headers, and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the site lacks publicly accessible detailed security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are recommended for transparency and trust. The use of service workers with debug capabilities indicates advanced technical controls. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing frameworks and controls (e.g., ISO 27001, NIST).
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  4. List certifications and compliance attestations to enhance trust.
  5. Maintain updated WHOIS records or provide transparency about domain registration privacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Akamai Technologies
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akamai Technologies
Description
Akamai is the cybersecurity and cloud computing company that powers and protects business online.
Key services
Cloud Computing, Security, Content Delivery Network (CDN), Edge Computing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (indicated by chunk.js files), Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), OneTrust (cookie consent), Boomerang (performance monitoring), Coveo (search), Service Workers
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager, React
Platforms
Web, Cloud
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Service worker with debug and policy controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Boomerang, ContentSquare
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Boomerang, Adobe DTM, Twitter UWT, ContentSquare
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Manager, OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on cloud computing, security, and CDN products
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, but domain is globally recognized and trusted
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical stack including Adobe Experience Manager CMS and React for frontend components, ensuring modularity and scalability. Performance monitoring is implemented via Boomerang and ContentSquare, supporting fast load times and user experience optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting is likely on Akamai's own CDN infrastructure, providing global reach and reliability. Technical risks are minimal, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soasta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soasta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.