Skip to main content

Security report for snadnedarcovstvi.cz

koalice Za snadné dárcovství · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 4 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'koalice Za snadné dárcovství' represents a Czech non-profit coalition focused on advancing individual fundraising through relationship-based donor engagement. It serves as a platform for non-profit organizations to collaborate, educate, and overcome obstacles in the donation process. The site positions itself as a key player in the Czech fundraising ecosystem, targeting non-profit organizations and fundraising professionals. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several common plugins, delivering a modern and responsive user experience with moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance documentation, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site appears legitimate and trustworthy, though the absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching snadnedarcovstvi.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention snadnedarcovstvi.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for snadnedarcovstvi.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The coalition operates as a small-sized non-profit entity in the Czech Republic, focusing on relationship fundraising development. Its business model revolves around member collaboration, education, and advocacy. The website content and navigation indicate a professional approach with clear segmentation of information such as coalition members, financing, ethical code, and membership conditions. The presence of partner links like 'www.zavetpomaha.cz' suggests an ecosystem of related non-profit initiatives. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and fundraising activities. The coalition's market position is niche but important within the Czech non-profit sector, emphasizing trust and ethical fundraising practices.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no contact channels for security issues are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
koalice Za snadné dárcovství
Description
Jsme nezávislou platformou pro neziskové organizace, které spojuje zájem o rozvoj vztahového fundraisingu. Zajímá nás takové dárcovství, které je založené na vzájemném poznávání dárce a obdarovaného. Podporujeme spolupráci mezi členskými organizacemi, jejich vzdělávání a snažíme se překonávat překážky, které proces darování komplikují.
Key services
podpora vztahového fundraisingu, vzdělávání členských organizací, překonávání překážek v darování
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Smart Logo Showcase Lite, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Swiper.js, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information limited to physical address; no emails or phone numbers explicitly found.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and common plugins.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. Content is focused on non-profit fundraising and collaboration.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder plugin, leveraging jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons. The site loads multiple external CSS and JS resources from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and responsive design features implemented. No advanced analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating a focus on content over tracking. The absence of security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with snadnedarcovstvi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review snadnedarcovstvi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.