Skip to main content

Security report for slv.com

SLV GmbH · Retail · Germany

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SLV GmbH operates a professional e-commerce platform specializing in high-quality lighting products for both residential and commercial customers, emphasizing German engineering and product reliability. The website is well-structured, multilingual, and targets a broad European market with a focus on Germany. The technical infrastructure leverages modern technologies including Spryker Commerce OS, Google Tag Manager, and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response details are absent. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, but the overall professional presentation and trust signals mitigate this concern. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, providing direct contact information, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slv.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SLV GmbH holds a solid position in the retail and manufacturing sectors of lighting products, serving both B2B and B2C customers across Europe. Their business model combines direct online sales with professional customer registration, offering benefits like extended warranties and fast delivery. The company leverages a multilingual platform to cater to diverse markets, enhancing growth potential. The use of advanced e-commerce technology and marketing tools supports efficient operations and customer engagement. However, the absence of visible direct contact details and domain registration transparency could be improved to strengthen customer trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of consent management platforms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and preparedness. No critical vulnerabilities or insecure libraries were detected in the analyzed content. To elevate security maturity, SLV GmbH should consider publishing comprehensive security documentation and providing clear channels for security incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SLV GmbH
Description
Professionelle Leuchten und Steuerungssysteme für Haus & Gewerbe: Tischleuchten, Wandleuchten, Pendelleuchten, Deckenleuchten - Engineered in Germany
Key services
Lighting product sales, Professional customer registration, Fast delivery services, 5-year product warranty
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Spryker Commerce OS, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP, Hotjar
Frameworks
Spryker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized for multiple European countries and languages.
  2. Strong emphasis on German engineering and product quality.
  3. Comprehensive product catalog with clear navigation.
  4. Use of modern tracking and consent management tools.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML; contact likely via forms.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Spryker Commerce OS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks and asynchronous script loading for performance. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management, and Hotjar for user behavior insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO best practices are followed with proper meta tags and hreflang attributes for internationalization. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in script loading and asset management. No major technical debts or risks were identified from the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.