Skip to main content

Security report for slitere.lv

Biedrība “Zaļā doma” · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website slitere.lv represents a small non-profit organization named Biedrība “Zaļā doma” focused on nature conservation and promotion of Slītere National Park in Latvia. The site provides detailed information about nature trails, park features, contact details, and project results, targeting nature enthusiasts, tourists, and local communities. The business model is informational and educational, supporting environmental awareness and sustainable tourism. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Maps API. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content structure, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, typical for a CMS-based site. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and HSTS enabled. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie consent policies, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional for its non-profit purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and transparency measures. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security.txt, and improving accessibility to strengthen user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slitere.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on environmental conservation and eco-tourism. Its market position is regional, serving visitors and stakeholders of Slītere National Park. The business model relies on providing educational content, visitor information, and project dissemination. Revenue streams are likely grant-based or donation-supported, typical for non-profits. The target customers include tourists, environmentalists, and local communities. Partnerships with governmental and tourism bodies are evident through linked domains. Growth indicators include active project reporting and multimedia content. The organization maintains a clear brand identity and consistent messaging aligned with its mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, protecting data in transit. Security headers are present but limited to HSTS. No signs of vulnerable or outdated libraries were found. The absence of privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, requiring transparent privacy disclosures. Overall, the security culture appears cautious but could improve in privacy compliance and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner with opt-in/out capabilities to comply with GDPR.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Biedrība “Zaļā doma”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība “Zaļā doma”
Description
Non-profit organization focused on nature conservation and promotion of Slītere National Park and surrounding natural areas in Latvia.
Key services
Nature trail information, Park information and promotion, Project results dissemination, Visitor information and contact support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Vimeo embedded video
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Squarespace hosted non-profit site focused on Slītere National Park in Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured with sections on nature trails, park information, contacts, and project results.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with emails and phone numbers matching the organization.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, but cookie usage is disclosed in an announcement bar without explicit consent mechanism.
  5. Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS enabled; no critical vulnerabilities detected.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content; site is safe for general audiences.
  8. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace, a reliable and widely used CMS platform, ensuring ease of content management and hosting stability. It uses modern web fonts and integrates Google services for analytics and maps, enhancing user experience and data insights. Performance is moderate, with some large images and embedded videos that could be optimized further. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but ongoing monitoring of third-party scripts is advised.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slitere.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slitere.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.