Skip to main content

Security report for slachtofferhulp.nl

Slachtofferhulp Nederland · Non-profit · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slachtofferhulp Nederland is a well-established non-profit organization in the Netherlands dedicated to providing support and assistance to victims of various incidents. Their services include emotional help, legal support during criminal proceedings, and assistance with damage compensation claims. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation targeting multiple audiences including victims, youth, helpers, and professionals. The organization maintains strong partnerships with official bodies such as the police and public prosecutor, reinforcing its credibility and market position. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, Genesys Cloud for messaging, and integrates video content via Vimeo. It uses Episerver CMS and is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with comprehensive SEO and privacy compliance features including cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, nonce-based script loading, and standard security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the site lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information, which could enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with high trustworthiness, excellent content quality, and good compliance with privacy regulations. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, establishing a vulnerability disclosure process, and enhancing incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slachtofferhulp.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Slachtofferhulp Nederland operates as a key national non-profit victim support organization in the Netherlands. Its business model focuses on providing free assistance and emotional support to victims of crime and accidents, supported by partnerships with governmental and non-governmental entities. The organization targets victims, youth, helpers, and professionals, offering tailored resources and advice. Its market position is strong due to official recognition and collaboration with law enforcement and justice departments. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated analytics and user engagement tools, indicating ongoing investment in digital transformation and outreach. The partnership ecosystem includes police, public prosecutor, damage compensation funds, and mediation services, which strengthens its service delivery and credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and script nonce attributes to mitigate XSS risks. Privacy compliance is evident through cookie consent dialogs and clear privacy policies. The use of Microsoft Application Insights and Cloudflare Insights indicates active monitoring and telemetry. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by formalizing security policies and incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance user trust by including certifications or compliance badges related to security and privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slachtofferhulp Nederland
Description
Slachtofferhulp Nederland helpt na een ingrijpende gebeurtenis. Je kunt bij ons terecht voor emotionele hulp, ondersteuning in het strafproces en hulp bij het aanvragen van een schadevergoeding.
Key services
Emotional help, Support in criminal process, Assistance with damage compensation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Microsoft Application Insights, Genesys Cloud Messenger, Vimeo Player, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of nonce attributes in scripts
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Application Insights, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Mopinion Pastease
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on victim support services in the Netherlands.
  3. Comprehensive navigation and content for multiple target audiences.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with user consent.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript, Episerver CMS, and integrates multiple third-party services such as Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, Genesys Cloud for chat/messaging, and Vimeo for video content. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, with Cloudflare providing CDN and security services. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and embedded content. The use of nonce attributes in scripts and security headers indicates attention to security best practices. Opportunities exist to streamline third-party integrations and improve performance further by optimizing script loading and caching.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slachtofferhulp.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slachtofferhulp.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.