Skip to main content

Security report for skyra.no

Skyra · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skyra is a Norwegian technology company offering a SaaS platform focused on user insight and improving website user experience through data-driven methodologies such as top tasks, user surveys, and continuous improvement reporting. The company targets organizations seeking to enhance self-service and user satisfaction on their websites. The website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and uses modern web technologies including Next.js and Sanity.io CMS. Hosting is inferred to be with Scaleway, a European cloud provider, aligning with GDPR compliance goals. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers properly configured, and a cookie consent mechanism is implemented to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of direct contact information, slightly reduces privacy compliance and business credibility scores. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for tech startups but reduces domain trust slightly. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small technology company in Norway.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skyra.no

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention skyra.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for skyra.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skyra occupies a niche in the user insight and UX improvement market, leveraging data and user feedback to help organizations make informed decisions. Their business model combines a SaaS platform with consulting and support services. The presence of reputable public sector clients and testimonials indicates a solid market position in Norway. The company emphasizes compliance with Norwegian and EU data privacy laws, using European hosting and cookie consent tools. Growth potential exists through expanding client base and feature development, as indicated by their beta program. The lack of publicly available company registration or contact details may be a strategic choice but could be improved for transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, modern security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The cookie consent banner is comprehensive, allowing users to customize preferences, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure reduces overall security transparency. No security contact emails or security.txt file were found. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS registration is typical but limits trust signals. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and privacy documentation and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy page linked in the website footer.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user and customer rights and obligations.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including a security or abuse contact email.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention and processing practices to improve GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skyra
Description
Skyra is a platform providing user insight tools to improve content and user experience on websites. It supports methodologies like top tasks, user testing, and continuous improvement with data-driven decision making.
Key services
User insight platform, Top tasks measurement, User surveys, User testing recruitment, Continuous improvement reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Sanity.io, CookieYes (cookie consent), Scaleway (hosting inferred from text)
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Sanity.io CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized
  7. Strong branding and client logos from reputable Norwegian public sector organizations
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework with Sanity.io as the CMS, ensuring good performance and scalability. The use of CookieYes for cookie consent management shows attention to privacy compliance. Hosting is likely with Scaleway, a European cloud provider, supporting data sovereignty requirements. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected in the provided content. The site could benefit from adding structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and richer search results. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and aligned with current best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skyra.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skyra.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.