Skip to main content

Security report for skypicker.com

Kiwi.com · Transportation · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kiwi.com is a prominent online travel agency specializing in providing cheap flights, hotels, and car rental services globally. The platform offers a user-friendly interface with advanced search capabilities including flexible dates and map-based destination exploration. It is trusted by millions and provides additional services such as disruption protection and 24/7 customer support. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with consistent branding and comprehensive content tailored for travelers seeking affordable travel options. Technically, Kiwi.com employs modern web technologies including React and Tailwind CSS, supported by Google Tag Manager and Forter for analytics and fraud prevention respectively. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, ensuring a seamless user experience across devices. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and presence of key security headers, although explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available. From a security and compliance perspective, Kiwi.com maintains a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is not publicly available, which slightly impacts trust but is common for commercial entities using privacy protection services. Overall, the site presents a strong security posture with room for improvement in transparency around incident response and vulnerability management. The overall risk assessment is moderate to low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing security transparency and providing clear contact channels for security incidents. Kiwi.com’s strategic position as a leading travel booking platform is supported by its technical infrastructure and user-centric design, making it a reliable choice for consumers worldwide.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skypicker.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention skypicker.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
226
Employees
2
Customers
187
Third parties
37
Weak passwords
19%

Latest record dated 2025-08-19 · 35 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for skypicker.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –nest.skypicker.com2025-08-19
  • –nest.skypicker.com2025-07-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kiwi.com operates in the global online travel market, targeting budget-conscious travelers seeking convenient and affordable flight options. Its competitive advantage lies in its flexible search engine, disruption protection, and comprehensive travel services including hotels and car rentals. The business model is based on aggregating travel inventory and earning commissions or fees from bookings. The company leverages partnerships with hotel providers and car rental services to expand its offerings. Growth indicators include a large user base, active social media presence, and continuous feature enhancements. The partnership ecosystem includes booking.com for accommodations and internal subsidiaries for technology and media. Strategic observations highlight Kiwi.com's focus on user experience, trust-building through guarantees, and leveraging technology for competitive differentiation.

Security posture

Kiwi.com demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. The use of Forter indicates proactive fraud prevention measures. Privacy compliance is evident with detailed policies and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of publicly available incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure programs represents a compliance gap and potential risk area. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security culture appears focused on protecting user data and ensuring transaction integrity, but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance transparency around certifications and compliance frameworks to strengthen trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and communicate clear data retention and privacy policies aligned with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kiwi.com
Description
Kiwi.com is an online travel agency specializing in cheap flights, hotels, and car hire with 24/7 customer support and disruption protection. It offers an interactive map, airport and destination guides, and a flexible search engine to find the best flight deals.
Key services
Flight search and booking, Hotel booking, Car hire, Disruption protection, Customer support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Tailwind CSS, Google Tag Manager, Forter (fraud prevention), Orbit UI components, Nitro framework
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of fraud prevention scripts (Forter)
  • Security page detailing policies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Forter
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong focus on user experience and mobile optimization.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  5. Social media presence is active and linked.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or protected, which slightly impacts trust but is common.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Tailwind CSS, ensuring a responsive and performant user interface. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Forter supports analytics and fraud prevention capabilities. The site architecture supports flexible search and interactive map features, enhancing user engagement. Performance is optimized with preloading of fonts and images. Accessibility considerations are present but could be further enhanced. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not disclosed but the site uses multiple CDN and security providers. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities for modernization including formal accessibility audits and expanded security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skypicker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skypicker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.