Skip to main content

Security report for skok.cz

Webglobe, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website skok.cz currently serves primarily as a contact point for Webglobe, s.r.o., a Czech-based web hosting or internet services provider. The site content is minimal, consisting solely of contact information including a physical address in Prague, a phone number, and an email address. There is no visible branding, privacy policies, or terms of service, which limits the site's professionalism and user trust. The domain is well-established, having been registered in 2003, which supports the legitimacy of the business behind it. From a technical perspective, the website lacks modern web technologies, frameworks, or CMS indicators. There are no scripts, analytics, or tracking mechanisms detected, and no evidence of HTTPS or security headers was found in the provided data. The site appears to be very basic and likely static, hosted by Webglobe, s.r.o., as inferred from the contact information. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be fully assessed but are likely poor given the minimal content. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security policies, or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer details are present. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the domain's Czech origin and hosting provider, indicating a legitimate registration without privacy protection. Overall, the site lacks essential compliance and security features expected for modern web presence. The overall risk is moderate due to minimal exposure but low professionalism and security maturity. Strategic improvements should focus on implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing content quality, and adding security best practices to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skok.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webglobe, s.r.o. operates in the technology sector, specifically providing web hosting services in the Czech Republic. The business model is service-oriented, targeting customers needing web hosting solutions. The domain age (since 2003) suggests an established presence, but the minimal website content indicates either a placeholder or a low-priority web presence. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies from the data provided. The company likely generates revenue through hosting services but lacks visible marketing or customer engagement features on this site. The contact information is clear and professional, but the absence of policies and security information may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS or SSL configuration, no security headers, and no published security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing immediate risk of data exposure but also limiting user interaction. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent, which supports legitimacy but does not compensate for the lack of technical security controls. Overall, the site is vulnerable to basic security risks and lacks maturity in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance website content and design to improve professionalism, user experience, and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Webglobe, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webglobe, s.r.o.
Description
Webglobe, s.r.o. appears to be a web hosting or internet services provider based on contact information and website references.
Key services
Web hosting
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and limited to contact information only.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No security or incident response information is provided.
  4. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No social media links found.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the domain and hosting provider.
  8. Website lacks modern SEO and accessibility features.
  9. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is minimalistic with no detected CMS, frameworks, or modern technologies. The hosting provider is likely Webglobe, s.r.o., as indicated by contact details. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks meta tags, SEO optimization, and accessibility features. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but are likely poor due to minimal content and lack of modern design elements. The technical infrastructure appears basic and could benefit from modernization to improve security, performance, and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skok.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skok.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.