Skip to main content

Security report for skapiec.pl

Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skąpiec.pl is a prominent Polish price comparison website offering users access to millions of products across thousands of stores, along with user reviews and ratings. It serves as a comprehensive platform for consumers to find the best prices and make informed purchasing decisions. The website targets a broad audience interested in retail shopping, particularly in electronics, home appliances, and various consumer goods. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks (likely React), integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as SalesManago, Gemius, and Google Tag Manager, and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design elements. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers in the provided data, and does not explicitly present privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of public WHOIS data suggests domain privacy protection, common for commercial websites, and does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its market presence and extensive content. Overall, Skąpiec.pl demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure suitable for its business model but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skapiec.pl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skąpiec.pl holds a strong market position as a leading price comparison service in Poland, leveraging a business model based on affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships with major retailers such as x-kom.pl, Mediaexpert, and Amazon.pl. The platform's revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions and advertising fees. Its target customers are general consumers seeking competitive pricing and product information. The website's extensive product catalog and user-generated reviews enhance its competitive advantage. Partnerships with numerous retail sites and integration of marketing tools indicate a well-established ecosystem. The lack of explicit company registration details in the WHOIS data is typical for privacy-conscious commercial entities. Growth indicators include frequent product updates and new offers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen user trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are not clearly presented, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, limiting transparency. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, enhancements in security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response readiness are recommended to elevate the security maturity level.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive and accessible privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide detailed information on data retention policies to improve user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Wyszukiwarka najlepszych cen: miliony produktów, tysiące sklepów, setki opinii dziennie, jedno miejsce – Skąpiec.pl – wejdź i oszczędzaj!
Key services
price comparison, product reviews, shop listings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Gemius (analytics), SalesManago (marketing automation), Opecloud, React (implied by __APP__ JSON structure), CSS
Frameworks
React (implied)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • async script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Gemius, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
SalesManago, Gemius, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Gemius, SalesManago
Marketing tools
SalesManago
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive Polish price comparison platform.
  2. No WHOIS data publicly available; domain likely privacy protected.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  5. Uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, likely including React for frontend rendering, and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Gemius, Google Analytics via GTM) and marketing automation (SalesManago). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and asynchronous script loading to improve performance. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph tags, and canonical URLs. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the use of CDN domains suggests distributed content delivery. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing third-party script usage and implementing advanced caching strategies. Accessibility is basic, with room for enhancements to meet WCAG standards. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a large-scale e-commerce comparison platform effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skapiec.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skapiec.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.