Skip to main content

Security report for skanska.cz

Skanska a.s. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skanska a.s. is a leading construction and development company operating in the Czech Republic, specializing in residential and commercial real estate development, infrastructure projects, and related services such as facility management and equipment rental. The company is part of the global Skanska Group and maintains a strong market position with a focus on sustainability and innovation. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and active social media engagement. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and form protections in place, although explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the company's identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skanska.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention skanska.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
218
Employees
0
Customers
14
Third parties
204
Weak passwords
3%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for skanska.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skanska's business model centers on large-scale construction and real estate development projects, targeting businesses, property buyers, suppliers, and job seekers in the Czech market. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offerings, sustainability certifications, and strong brand reputation. The company leverages digital tools for marketing and analytics, and maintains active communication channels including social media and detailed contact information. The presence of subsidiaries and a parent company domain indicates a well-structured corporate ecosystem. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and recent press releases highlighting leadership changes and new developments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, use of reCAPTCHA on forms, cookie consent management, and standard security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The site uses trusted third-party scripts and analytics services, but continuous monitoring and auditing of these components are recommended to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to enhance transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to improve GDPR compliance visibility.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form input validation and monitoring to prevent abuse and ensure data integrity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Skanska a.s.
Registration number
26271303
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skanska a.s.
Description
Leading construction and development company in the Czech Republic, building, modernizing, and maintaining buildings and infrastructure.
Key services
Residential development, Commercial development, Construction (building, road, railway), Facility management, Equipment rental, Concrete production and delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on contact forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong presence of corporate branding and trust signals.
  3. Comprehensive navigation with detailed service and project information.
  4. Active social media integration with Facebook and LinkedIn posts.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust implementation.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics, with Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA integrated for tracking and security. The CMS appears to be Sitecore or a similar enterprise platform, supporting a structured and scalable content architecture. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses OneTrust for cookie consent, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the presence of Azure monitoring scripts suggests possible Microsoft Azure hosting or services.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skanska.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skanska.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.