Skip to main content

Security report for sitios.info

Ginto · Non-profit · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ginto is a Swiss non-profit organization providing a comprehensive platform for information about the accessibility of locations across Switzerland. The website offers tools such as a web map and a mobile app to find, record, and share accessibility data. The platform targets individuals seeking accessibility information and those willing to contribute data, positioning itself as a leading resource in this niche. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with multilingual support in German, French, and English. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, which slightly impacts trust but is understandable for a privacy-conscious non-profit. Overall, the site is professional, functional, and trustworthy with room for enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitios.info

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ginto operates in the non-profit sector focusing on accessibility information dissemination in Switzerland. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive data collection and sharing platform, supported by community participation. The business model revolves around providing free access to accessibility data via web and mobile applications. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely include grants, donations, or partnerships. The target customers are individuals with accessibility needs and contributors. The organization maintains a LinkedIn presence and partners with other entities in the accessibility ecosystem. Growth indicators include active project pages and community engagement features. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding partnerships and enhancing data privacy transparency to strengthen credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure contact forms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness perception. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but would benefit from implementing best practices and transparency measures to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Improve WHOIS data transparency or provide clear registrant contact information to increase trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ginto
Description
Ginto findet, erfasst und teilt Informationen zur Zugänglichkeit von Lokalitäten. Ginto ist die umfassendste Plattform von Informationen zur Zugänglichkeit von Lokalitäten in der Schweiz.
Key services
Ginto Webkarte, Ginto App, Informationsbereitstellung zur Barrierefreiheit, Community-Mitwirkung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Contact form with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. Content is in German (de-CH) with multilingual support
  3. Focus on accessibility information for Swiss locations
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. No security policy or incident response information published
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design ensuring good mobile usability. Accessibility features such as skip links and language selectors are implemented, enhancing usability for diverse users. Hosting appears to be via Identity Digital or a related provider. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Technical debt is low, but security header implementation and cookie consent mechanisms are areas for improvement to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitios.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitios.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.