Skip to main content

Security report for sitepackagebuilder.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website get.typo3.org/sitepackage serves as a resource hub for TYPO3 CMS template development, providing starter sitepackage templates and related resources primarily targeting TYPO3 developers and integrators. It operates within the open source software ecosystem, focusing on facilitating template creation for TYPO3 CMS users. The site demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing modern web technologies such as Web Components and integrating Usercentrics for consent management, indicating awareness of privacy requirements though lacking explicit policy pages. From a security perspective, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of contact information and WHOIS registrant data reduces the overall business credibility and trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but improvements in security best practices and transparency are recommended. Overall, the site is functional and well-targeted for its niche audience but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, clearer business information, and improved security configurations to strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 24 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitepackagebuilder.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a niche market within the TYPO3 CMS community, offering template development resources which likely generate value through community engagement and support rather than direct commercial revenue. Its business model aligns with open source community support and resource sharing. The lack of explicit company or organizational information suggests it is maintained by a community or foundation rather than a commercial entity. The site’s market position is specialized, serving developers needing TYPO3 sitepackage templates. Growth potential depends on TYPO3 CMS adoption and community contributions. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the content.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is presumably enabled (implied by the URL scheme), but no security headers were detected in the content provided. The integration of Usercentrics indicates some level of privacy and consent management, yet the absence of privacy and cookie policies, security.txt, or incident response contacts limits compliance and readiness. No direct vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure were found, but the site lacks comprehensive security best practices documentation and transparency. Incident response mechanisms and certifications are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security governance and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and business details.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
TYPO3 sitepackage starter templates and resources for TYPO3 CMS template development.
Key services
TYPO3 sitepackage templates, Template development resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Web Components, Usercentrics Consent Management
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS, Usercentrics Consent Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a TYPO3 CMS community resource for sitepackage templates.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to malformed WHOIS response.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  5. Uses Usercentrics for cookie consent management but no explicit cookie policy page found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No business entity or company registration information found.
  8. No social media links or external contact points detected.
  9. Website content is technical and developer-focused.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with Web Components, and integrates Usercentrics for consent management. It is built on TYPO3 CMS, a well-known open source content management system. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains such as cdn.typo3.com and app.usercentrics.eu. Performance appears moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitepackagebuilder.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitepackagebuilder.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.