Skip to main content

Security report for sitemodify.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SiteModify is a technology platform providing website editing services through a secure login portal. The site integrates modern authentication mechanisms including Google OAuth and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect user access. The platform targets website owners and editors, offering a SaaS model for site management. Technically, the site uses a modern JavaScript stack with jQuery, jQuery UI, and asynchronous module loading, supported by external fonts and analytics services such as Mixpanel. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and bot protection in place; however, the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, impacting overall business credibility. No contact or compliance information is visible, limiting transparency and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitemodify.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
62
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sitemodify.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
179
Employees
0
Customers
179
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sitemodify.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on website editing tools delivered via a SaaS platform. The target market includes small to medium website owners requiring editing capabilities. The platform leverages Google services for authentication and bot mitigation, indicating integration with established ecosystems. The absence of detailed business information, certifications, or contact details suggests a smaller or early-stage operation. Analytics usage via Mixpanel indicates a focus on user behavior tracking for product improvement or marketing. The domain's WHOIS inconsistency could impact partnerships and customer confidence. No evident advertising or affiliate programs were detected, suggesting a direct service model without third-party monetization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration, reducing risks from unauthorized access and automated attacks. The use of OAuth 2.0 for login enhances authentication security. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense in depth. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which may lead to compliance gaps with GDPR or other regulations. The absence of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels for security and abuse reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO metadata to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
SiteModify appears to be a platform for website editing and management, providing users with login access to edit their sites.
Key services
website editing, user login authentication, Google OAuth login integration
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, jQuery UI 1.13.2, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Mixpanel analytics, RequireJS, JavaScript ES5/ES6, CSS3, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration for bot protection
  • OAuth 2.0 Google sign-in implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for a website editing platform.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  4. Uses Google OAuth and reCAPTCHA Enterprise for authentication security.
  5. No contact or business registration information visible.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  7. No advertising or affiliate programs detected beyond Mixpanel analytics.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with jQuery and jQuery UI libraries, asynchronous module loading via RequireJS, and Google Fonts for typography. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot mitigation and Mixpanel for analytics tracking. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating good SSL configuration. The login page is dynamically rendered with JavaScript, including OAuth 2.0 Google sign-in. Performance is moderate with multiple external resources loaded from CDNs. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. Accessibility features are minimal, with some placeholder polyfills for older browsers. SEO optimization is limited, with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a proprietary CMS platform. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitemodify.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitemodify.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.