Skip to main content

Security report for sitekick.digital

KijkMijnHuis · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moving Digital operates as a specialized online marketing provider for the real estate sector in the Netherlands, offering tools such as Sitekick, a property value indication and lead generation tool. The company is registered as KijkMijnHuis and has an established digital presence since 2017. The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms including HubSpot and Pipedrive, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is professionally designed with good SEO and mobile optimization, targeting real estate professionals seeking lead generation solutions. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are not found on the analyzed page, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and trustworthy, with no signs of malicious or adult content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitekick.digital

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche marketing specialist for the real estate industry, leveraging proprietary tools like Sitekick to generate leads for real estate agents. Its business model focuses on digital marketing services and SaaS tools for property professionals. The use of HubSpot and Pipedrive indicates integration with CRM and marketing automation, supporting scalable lead management. The target market is Dutch real estate agents and agencies, with a small company size and focused sector expertise. The website content and metadata emphasize lead collection and contact facilitation, reflecting a B2B service orientation. No direct contact details or extensive corporate information are publicly available on the analyzed page, which may limit direct customer engagement. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS to spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended to enhance browser security. The site uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts, increasing the attack surface and requiring careful management of script integrity. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests incomplete GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the website with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  5. Review and minimize third-party scripts to reduce attack surface and ensure script integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KijkMijnHuis
Description
De (online) marketingspecialist voor de makelaardij; Sitekick; Dé woningwaarde indicatietool. Collecteer leads via uw eigen website en kom in contact met potentiële opdrachtgevers.
Key services
Online marketing for real estate, Lead generation via Sitekick woningwaarde indicatietool, Digital tools integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.2, Enfold Theme, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts (Raleway), HubSpot scripts, Pipedrive LeadBooster, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sitekick widget
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Pipedrive LeadBooster
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Enfold theme with professional design
  2. Focuses on real estate marketing and lead generation tools
  3. Uses multiple marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot and Pipedrive
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found on the analyzed page
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content
  6. Domain is registered to a Dutch organization consistent with website language and market
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme, with jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. It integrates advanced marketing tools such as HubSpot, Pipedrive LeadBooster, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a sophisticated marketing automation setup. Hosting appears to be managed via TransIP, a reputable Dutch hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata in place. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. The presence of multiple external scripts requires ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business model well but has room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitekick.digital. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitekick.digital.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.